> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Qiming Chen
> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2021 12:11 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Xing, Beilei <beilei.x...@intel.com>; Qiming Chen
> <chenqiming_hua...@163.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/i40e: solve vf rxq buf size alignment
>
> The RTE_ALIGN macro is aligned upwards. If the buf_size variable is not
> aligned
> with 1 << I40E_RXQ_CTX_DBUFF_SHIFT, the rx_buf_len is larger than the
> actual mbuf memory after the operation. When receiving the packet, if the
> packet is larger than the configured buf_size, it will cause a memory stepping
> event.
>
> The patch uses the RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR down alignment macro to correct the
> problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiming Chen <chenqiming_hua...@163.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> index 924da8dfb4..5b1c8e76ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> @@ -1927,7 +1927,7 @@ i40evf_rxq_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct
> i40e_rx_queue *rxq)
> RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
> rxq->hs_mode = i40e_header_split_none;
> rxq->rx_hdr_len = 0;
> - rxq->rx_buf_len = RTE_ALIGN(buf_size, (1 <<
> I40E_RXQ_CTX_DBUFF_SHIFT));
> + rxq->rx_buf_len = RTE_ALIGN_FLOOR(buf_size, (1 <<
> +I40E_RXQ_CTX_DBUFF_SHIFT));
> len = rxq->rx_buf_len * I40E_MAX_CHAINED_RX_BUFFERS;
> rxq->max_pkt_len = RTE_MIN(len,
> dev_data->dev_conf.rxmode.max_rx_pkt_len);
> --
> 2.30.1.windows.1
The patch is not applied for main repo as i40evf will be removed, you can
submit a fix to dpdk-stable directly.
