> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2021 6:46 PM
> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>; Ben Magistro <konce...@gmail.com>;
> dev@dpdk.org; Beilei Xing <beilei.x...@intel.com>;
> Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Christian Ehrhardt
> <christian.ehrha...@canonical.com>; Xueming(Steven) Li
> <xuemi...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: ben.magis...@trinitycyber.com; stefan.baran...@trinitycyber.com; Qi Zhang
> <qi.z.zh...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] driver: i40evf device initialization
>
> + Christian and Xueming
>
> On 26/08/2021 11:25, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 8/25/2021 8:45 PM, Ben Magistro wrote:
> >> The i40evf driver is not initializing the eth_dev attribute which can
> >> result in a nullptr dereference. Changes were modeled after the
> >> iavf_dev_init() per suggestion from the mailing list[1].
> >>
> >> [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-August/217251.html
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ben Magistro <konce...@gmail.com>
> >
> > i40evf will be removed in this release. But I guess it helps for
> > stable releases to first merge the fixes and later removed it, not sure.
> >
> > @Luca, @Kevin, do you prefer this patch directly to stable repos, or
> > through the main repo?
>
> I'll leave to Luca/Xueming and Christian to say if they have a preference,
> but I'd guess either way is fine from stable view once it has
> fixes/stable tags or LTS patch prefix (it doesn't have any of these at
> present).
Yes, any option will make it being noticed by LTS maintainer:
1. patches accepted by main with "fix" in subject
2. patches accepted by main with "cc: sta...@dpdk.org" in commit message
3. patches backported to LTS, sent to stable maillist with LTS prefix, for
example "[20.11]"
>
> > i40evf won't be tested in the main anyway, since it would be removed
> > before -rc1 testing, so it looks like there won't be any difference from
> > testing point of view.
> >
> >
> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c | 8 ++++++--
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> >> b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> >> index 0cfe13b7b2..ccdce9a16a 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/i40e/i40e_ethdev_vf.c
> >> @@ -1564,8 +1564,9 @@ i40evf_dev_alarm_handler(void *param) static
> >> int i40evf_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev) {
> >> - struct i40e_hw *hw
> >> - = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> >> + struct i40e_adapter *adapter =
> >> + I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> >> + struct i40e_hw *hw = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_HW(adapter);
> >> struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = RTE_ETH_DEV_TO_PCI(eth_dev);
> >>
> >> PMD_INIT_FUNC_TRACE();
> >> @@ -1596,11 +1597,14 @@ i40evf_dev_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev)
> >> hw->device_id = pci_dev->id.device_id;
> >> hw->subsystem_vendor_id = pci_dev->id.subsystem_vendor_id;
> >> hw->subsystem_device_id = pci_dev->id.subsystem_device_id;
> >> + hw->bus.bus_id = pci_dev->addr.bus;
> >> hw->bus.device = pci_dev->addr.devid;
> >> hw->bus.func = pci_dev->addr.function;
> >> hw->hw_addr = (void *)pci_dev->mem_resource[0].addr;
> >> hw->adapter_stopped = 1;
> >> hw->adapter_closed = 0;
> >> + hw->back = I40E_DEV_PRIVATE_TO_ADAPTER(eth_dev->data->dev_private);
> >> + adapter->eth_dev = eth_dev;
> >>
> >> if(i40evf_init_vf(eth_dev) != 0) {
> >> PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR, "Init vf failed");
> >>
> >
