It seems that I send this patch to a wrong place, please just ignore it. Thanks, Chengfeng ________________________________ 发件人: YE Chengfeng <cy...@connect.ust.hk> 发送时间: 2021年8月27日 2:56 收件人: asoma...@amd.com <asoma...@amd.com> 抄送: dev@dpdk.org <dev@dpdk.org>; YE Chengfeng <cy...@connect.ust.hk> 主题: [PATCH v2] net/mlx5: fix potential unreleased lock problem
The lock sh->txpp.mutex isn't correctly released if the function return in these two branches, which may lead to deadlock if the lock is acquired again. Cc: cy...@connect.ust.hk Bugzilla ID: 774 Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <cy...@connect.ust.hk> --- drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c index 4f6da9f2d1..0ece788a84 100644 --- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c +++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_txpp.c @@ -961,8 +961,12 @@ mlx5_txpp_stop(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) MLX5_ASSERT(!ret); RTE_SET_USED(ret); MLX5_ASSERT(sh->txpp.refcnt); - if (!sh->txpp.refcnt || --sh->txpp.refcnt) + if (!sh->txpp.refcnt || --sh->txpp.refcnt) { + ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex); + MLX5_ASSERT(!ret); + RTE_SET_USED(ret); return; + } /* No references any more, do actual destroy. */ mlx5_txpp_destroy(sh); ret = pthread_mutex_unlock(&sh->txpp.mutex); -- 2.17.1