On Tue, 24 Aug 2021 20:03:03 +0000 Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com> wrote:
> > One difference between this implementation and the previous one is this busy > > loop. rte_pause() relaxes the cpu, but will not make the calling thread to > > sleep > > and wait for the sync event. So here we can spin a quite long time until the > > other thread is scheduled by the OS. > Yes, this is a difference. We could add a microsleep to allow for the OS to > un-schedule the current thread. Why not use sched_yield() here?
