>On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 3:52 PM Thomas Monjalon ><tho...@monjalon.net> wrote: >> >> This is a reorg of the patches from Pavan. >> It has been discussed that it should wait for DPDK 21.11 >> for ABI compatibility reason. >> >> Pavan Nikhilesh (3): >> net/thunderx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux >> common/octeontx: enable build only on 64-bit Linux >> common/octeontx2: enable build only on 64-bit Linux >> >> drivers/common/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ >> drivers/common/octeontx2/meson.build | 4 ++-- >> drivers/compress/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ >> drivers/crypto/octeontx/meson.build | 7 +++++-- >> drivers/event/octeontx/meson.build | 6 ++++++ >> drivers/event/octeontx2/meson.build | 4 ++-- >> drivers/mempool/octeontx/meson.build | 5 +++-- >> drivers/mempool/octeontx2/meson.build | 9 ++------- >> drivers/net/octeontx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >> drivers/net/octeontx2/meson.build | 10 ++-------- >> drivers/net/thunderx/meson.build | 4 ++-- >> drivers/raw/octeontx2_dma/meson.build | 10 ++++++---- >> 12 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-) > >There were a couple of cleanups (indent etc..) and changes in meson >files. >This series does not apply cleanly on the main branch. >Could you rebase it?
Ack l will rebase it. > >I noticed that the net/cnxk driver does not have this check, but it is >disabled anyway since it depends on common/cnxk. >Is it worth adding the check for consistency? Sure I will add checks to cnxk driver family. Thanks, Pavan. > > >-- >David Marchand
