> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
> Sent: 23 июля 2021 г. 23:07
> To: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozl...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bus: clarify log for non-NUMA-aware devices
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 6/16/21 1:07 PM, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > PCI and vmbus drivers printed a warning when NUMA node had beed
> > reported as (-1) or not reported by OS:
> >
> > EAL: Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0
> >
> > This message and its level might confuse users, because configuration
> > is valid and nothing happens that requires attention or intervention.
> >
> > Reduce level to INFO, reword the message, and suppress it when there
> > is only one NUMA node, bacause NUMA-awareness does not matter in this
> case.
> >
> > Fixes: f0e0e86aa35d ("pci: move NUMA node check from scan to probe")
> > Fixes: 831dba47bd36 ("bus/vmbus: add Hyper-V virtual bus support")
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dkozl...@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Xueming Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Add NUMA node count check (Stephen Hemminger).
> >
> > doc/guides/nics/ena.rst | 2 +-
> > drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c | 4 ++--
> > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst index
> > 0f1f63f722..694ce1da74 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/nics/ena.rst
> > @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ Example output:
> >
> > [...]
> > EAL: PCI device 0000:00:06.0 on NUMA socket -1
> > - EAL: Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0
> > + EAL: Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting socket to 0
> > EAL: probe driver: 1d0f:ec20 net_ena
> >
> > Interactive-mode selected
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> > b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c index 35d7d092d1..0bb56d9b7f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/pci/pci_common.c
> > @@ -189,8 +189,8 @@ rte_pci_probe_one_driver(struct rte_pci_driver *dr,
> > return 1;
> > }
> >
> > - if (dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> > - RTE_LOG(WARNING, EAL, " Invalid NUMA socket, default to
> > 0\n");
> > + if (rte_socket_count() > 1 && dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> > + RTE_LOG(INFO, EAL, " Device is not NUMA-aware,
> > + defaulting socket to 0\n");
> > dev->device.numa_node = 0;
>
> Is it intended side-effect of the patch that above assignment is not done if
> node
> is negative and there is only one socket?
TBH, it was not intended, but after analyzing dev->device.numa_node usages,
I think this can be the right thing to do. Even if there is only one NUMA node,
its number may be different from 0, e. g. if we're running on a set of cores
that belong to another node. For safety we can change this patch to only affect
logs,
then fix numa_node setting as a follow-up
(maybe set it to the real number of the only node).
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> > b/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> > index d25fd14ef5..5b654b0289 100644
> > --- a/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> > +++ b/drivers/bus/vmbus/vmbus_common.c
> > @@ -111,8 +111,8 @@ vmbus_probe_one_driver(struct rte_vmbus_driver
> *dr,
> > /* reference driver structure */
> > dev->driver = dr;
> >
> > - if (dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> > - VMBUS_LOG(WARNING, " Invalid NUMA socket, default to 0");
> > + if (rte_socket_count() > 1 && dev->device.numa_node < 0) {
> > + VMBUS_LOG(INFO, " Device is not NUMA-aware, defaulting
> > + socket to 0\n");
> > dev->device.numa_node = 0;
>
> Same question here.
>
> > }
> >
> >
