On Sat, 24 Jul 2021 09:58:44 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net> wrote:
> 23/07/2021 17:45, Stephen Hemminger:
> > The first argument to rte_bsf32_safe was incorrectly declared as
> > a 64 bit value. The code only works on 32 bit values and the underlying
> > function rte_bsf32 only accepts 32 bit values. This was a mistake
> > introduced when the safe version was added and probably cause
> > by copy/paste from the 64 bit version.
> >
> > The bug passed silently under the radar until some other code was
> > built with -Wall and -Wextra in C++ and C++ complains about the
> > missing cast.
> >
> > Yes, this is a API signature change, but the original code was wrong.
> > It is an inline so not an ABI change.
> >
> > Fixes: 4e261f551986 ("eal: add 64-bit bsf and 32-bit safe bsf functions")
> > Cc: anatoly.bura...@intel.com
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <step...@networkplumber.org>
> > Acked-by: Tyler Retzlaff <roret...@linux.microsoft.com>
>
> +Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>
> Applied, thanks.
>
> I think these functions lack a reference to the name Bit Scan Forward.
>
>
>
>
Tyler wanted to fix a bunch more stuff in these for 21.11 where it will
be a bigger API change.
