On 18/06/2015 18:55, O'Driscoll, Tim wrote: > I like Olivier's proposal on using a single option (CONFIG_RTE_NEXT_ABI) to > control all of these changes instead of a separate option per patch set > (seehttp://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-June/019147.html), so I think we > should rework the affected patch sets to use that approach for 2.1.
Do we have any other options to meet the short deadlines of 2.1?
