On Wed, 21 Jul 2021 17:58:14 +0200 Martin Havlik <xhavl...@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> wrote:
> The ability to create RTE flow rules, depending on > port status, can and does differ between PMDs. > Now the doc reflects that. > > Signed-off-by: Martin Havlik <xhavl...@stud.fit.vutbr.cz> > --- > doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst > b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst > index 2b42d5ec8c..2988e3328a 100644 > --- a/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst > +++ b/doc/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.rst > @@ -3097,6 +3097,10 @@ actually created and a handle returned. > const struct rte_flow_action *actions[], > struct rte_flow_error *error); > > +The ability to create a flow rule may depend on the status (started/stopped) > +of the port for which the rule is being created. This behaviour is > +PMD specific. Seek relevant PMD documentation for details. Any PMD specific behavior in DPDK is an anathema to application developers and should be considered a design flaw!