> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akhil Goyal <gak...@marvell.com>
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2021 3:45 AM
> To: Shiri Kuzin <shi...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com>; Suanming Mou
> <suanmi...@nvidia.com>; david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: RE: [EXT] [PATCH v8 06/16] crypto/mlx5: add dev stop and start
> operations
> 
> > Add the dev_start function that is used to start a configured device.
> > Add the dev_stop function that is used to stop a configured device.
> >
> > Both functions set the dev parameter as used and return 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Shiri Kuzin <shi...@nvidia.com>
> > Acked-by: Matan Azrad <ma...@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/crypto/mlx5/mlx5_crypto.c | 17 +++++++++++++++--
> >  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/crypto/mlx5/mlx5_crypto.c
> > b/drivers/crypto/mlx5/mlx5_crypto.c
> > index ebaa65c7a9..37e66cf57b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/crypto/mlx5/mlx5_crypto.c
> > +++ b/drivers/crypto/mlx5/mlx5_crypto.c
> > @@ -131,6 +131,19 @@ mlx5_crypto_dev_configure(struct rte_cryptodev
> > *dev,
> >     return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static void
> > +mlx5_crypto_dev_stop(struct rte_cryptodev *dev) {
> > +   RTE_SET_USED(dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +mlx5_crypto_dev_start(struct rte_cryptodev *dev) {
> > +   RTE_SET_USED(dev);
> > +   return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int
> >  mlx5_crypto_dev_close(struct rte_cryptodev *dev)  { @@ -360,8 +373,8
> > @@ mlx5_crypto_queue_pair_setup(struct rte_cryptodev *dev, uint16_t
> > qp_id,
> >
> >  static struct rte_cryptodev_ops mlx5_crypto_ops = {
> >     .dev_configure                  = mlx5_crypto_dev_configure,
> > -   .dev_start                      = NULL,
> > -   .dev_stop                       = NULL,
> > +   .dev_start                      = mlx5_crypto_dev_start,
> > +   .dev_stop                       = mlx5_crypto_dev_stop,
> >     .dev_close                      = mlx5_crypto_dev_close,
> >     .dev_infos_get                  = mlx5_crypto_dev_infos_get,
> >     .stats_get                      = NULL,
> 
> 
> This patch could be squashed in your basic operations patch as these ops are 
> not
> doing Anything.

OK, good suggestion.

Reply via email to