On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:22 AM Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru> wrote: > The build works fine for me on FC34, but it has > libatomic-11.1.1-3.fc34.x86_64 installed.
I first produced the issue on my "old" FC32. Afaics, for FC33 and later, gcc now depends on libatomic and the problem won't be noticed. FC32 and before are EOL, but I then reproduced the issue on RHEL 8 (and Intel CI reported it on Centos 8 too). > > I'd like to understand what we're trying to solve here. > Are we trying to make meson to report the missing library > correctly? > > If so, I think I can do simple check using cc.links() > which will fail if the library is not found. I'll > test that it works as expected if the library is not > completely installed. > I tried below diff, and it works for me. "works" as in net/sfc gets disabled without libatomic installed: diff --git a/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build b/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build index 32b58e3d76..8d62aad774 100644 --- a/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build +++ b/drivers/net/sfc/meson.build @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ endif if (arch_subdir != 'x86' or not dpdk_conf.get('RTE_ARCH_64')) and (arch_subdir != 'arm' or not host_machine.cpu_family().startswith('aarch64')) build = false reason = 'only supported on x86_64 and aarch64' + subdir_done() endif extra_flags = [] @@ -46,6 +47,14 @@ endif # for gcc compiles we need -latomic for 128-bit atomic ops if cc.get_id() == 'gcc' + code = '''#include <stdio.h> + void main() { printf("Atomilink me.\n"); } + ''' + if not cc.links(code, args: '-latomic', name: 'libatomic link check') + build = false + reason = 'missing dependency, "libatomic"' + subdir_done() + endif ext_deps += cc.find_library('atomic') endif -- David Marchand