Tested-by: Michael Qiu <michael.qiu at intel.com> - OS: Fedora20 3.11.10-301 - GCC: gcc version 4.8.3 2014911 - CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v2 @ 2.80GHz - NIC: Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation Device 15a4 (rev 01) - Default x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc configuration
On 5/29/2015 4:11 PM, Chen, Jing D wrote: > From: "Chen Jing D(Mark)" <jing.d.chen at intel.com> > > As RX buffer is aligned to 512B within mbuf, some bytes are reserved > for this purpose, and the worst case could be 511B. But SRR reg > assumes all buffers have the same size. In order to fill the gap, > we'll have to consider the worsst case and assume 512B is reserved. > If we don't do so, it's possible for HW to overwrite data to next > mbuf. > > Signed-off-by: Chen Jing D(Mark) <jing.d.chen at intel.com> > --- > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h | 5 +++-- > drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h > index 0e31796..ad7a7d1 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h > @@ -191,7 +191,8 @@ struct fm10k_tx_queue { > > /* enforce 512B alignment on default Rx DMA addresses */ > #define MBUF_DMA_ADDR_DEFAULT(mb) \ > - ((uint64_t) RTE_ALIGN(((mb)->buf_physaddr + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM), 512)) > + ((uint64_t) RTE_ALIGN(((mb)->buf_physaddr + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM),\ > + FM10K_RX_DATABUF_ALIGN)) > > static inline void fifo_reset(struct fifo *fifo, uint32_t len) > { > @@ -263,7 +264,7 @@ fm10k_addr_alignment_valid(struct rte_mbuf *mb) > uint64_t boundary1, boundary2; > > /* 512B aligned? */ > - if (RTE_ALIGN(addr, 512) == addr) > + if (RTE_ALIGN(addr, FM10K_RX_DATABUF_ALIGN) == addr) > return 1; > > /* 8B aligned, and max Ethernet frame would not cross a 4KB boundary? */ > diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c > b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c > index 275c19c..a5e09a0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c > +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_ethdev.c > @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ > #include "fm10k.h" > #include "base/fm10k_api.h" > > -#define FM10K_RX_BUFF_ALIGN 512 > /* Default delay to acquire mailbox lock */ > #define FM10K_MBXLOCK_DELAY_US 20 > #define UINT64_LOWER_32BITS_MASK 0x00000000ffffffffULL > @@ -426,6 +425,15 @@ fm10k_dev_rx_init(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) > /* Configure the Rx buffer size for one buff without split */ > buf_size = (uint16_t)(rte_pktmbuf_data_room_size(rxq->mp) - > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM); > + /* As RX buffer is aligned to 512B within mbuf, some bytes are > + * reserved for this purpose, and the worst case could be 511B. > + * But SRR reg assumes all buffers have the same size. In order > + * to fill the gap, we'll have to consider the worst case and > + * assume 512B is reserved. If we don't do so, it's possible > + * for HW to overwrite data to next mbuf. > + */ > + buf_size -= FM10K_RX_DATABUF_ALIGN; > + > FM10K_WRITE_REG(hw, FM10K_SRRCTL(i), > buf_size >> FM10K_SRRCTL_BSIZEPKT_SHIFT); > > @@ -909,7 +917,7 @@ mempool_element_size_valid(struct rte_mempool *mp) > RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM; > > /* account for up to 512B of alignment */ > - min_size -= FM10K_RX_BUFF_ALIGN; > + min_size -= FM10K_RX_DATABUF_ALIGN; > > /* sanity check for overflow */ > if (min_size > mp->elt_size)