2021-06-24 15:45 (UTC+0100), Ferruh Yigit: > As discussed in the technical board meeting > https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-February/200012.html > > This is to record that new upstreamed devices tested adequately. > > Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> > --- > CC: John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org > --- > content/testing/_index.md | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/content/testing/_index.md b/content/testing/_index.md > index fcdc47feca9a..3e430f8640af 100644 > --- a/content/testing/_index.md > +++ b/content/testing/_index.md > @@ -116,6 +116,10 @@ some validation reports are requested to the community > members. > > Such release validations are sent as replies to the release announcement. > > +It is not easy (or not possible at all) to test PMDs other than device > vendors,
I'm not a native speaker, but is "for" missing (to do X is easy for Y)? Suggestion: for anyone other than device vendors. > +that is why it is expected vendors send a release validation report at least > in > +the first release that the PMD is upstreamed. > + > > ## Tools > ---
