19/05/2021 19:47, Ferruh Yigit:
> On 5/19/2021 6:33 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The Doxygen comments are placed before the related lines,
> > but the markers were /**< instead of /**
> >
> > The struct rte_flow_item_integrity did not appear in Doxygen output
> > because there was no general comment for the struct.
> >
> > Fixes: b10a421a1f3b ("ethdev: add packet integrity check flow rules")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> > Acked-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
> > Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khapa...@broadcom.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com>
>
>
> btw, there are some related issues for other structs, do you think should we
> fix
> them in this release?
>
> Following are missing doxygen comment for its item:
> * "struct rte_flow_item_conntrack"
> * "struct rte_flow_item_ecpri"
>
> * Following are missing doxygen comments for its items, and missing
> experimental
> tag.
> * "struct rte_flow_item_geneve_opt"
> * "struct rte_flow_item_ipv6_frag_ext"
>
> And I suspect we can see similar issues with more structs as we check them
> all.
Except GENEVE, they are singleton (one member in the struct),
so it is not a big deal.
Given they are missing comment (not wrong), I propose to wait the next release
for making rte_flow doxygen more complete.
I plan to have a look at the rst doc as well.
