On 4/27/2021 7:30 AM, Tianyu Li wrote:
> Hi Jakub,
> 
> Any comments about the patch?
> 

+Damjan.

Hi Damjan,

Is Jakub still maintaining the net/memif?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yi...@intel.com> 
> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 4:13 PM
> To: Tianyu Li <tianyu...@arm.com>; Jakub Grajciar <jgraj...@cisco.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/memif: fix missing Tx-bps stats for zero-copy
> 
> On 4/12/2021 9:22 AM, Tianyu Li wrote:
>> Fix the missing Tx-bps counter for memif zero-copy mode Before
>>    Rx-pps:      6891450          Rx-bps:   3528438928
>>    Tx-pps:      6891482          Tx-bps:            0
>> After
>>    Throughput (since last show)
>>    Rx-pps:     11157056          Rx-bps:   5712413016
>>    Tx-pps:     11157056          Tx-bps:   5712413016
>>
>> Fixes: 43b815d88188 ("net/memif: support zero-copy slave")
>> Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Li <tianyu...@arm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/memif/rte_eth_memif.c | 1 +
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/memif/rte_eth_memif.c 
>> b/drivers/net/memif/rte_eth_memif.c
>> index 77c95bcb7..dd2825968 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/memif/rte_eth_memif.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/memif/rte_eth_memif.c
>> @@ -706,6 +706,7 @@ memif_tx_one_zc(struct pmd_process_private 
>> *proc_private, struct memif_queue *mq
>>      /* populate descriptor */
>>      d0 = &ring->desc[slot & mask];
>>      d0->length = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(mbuf);
>> +    mq->n_bytes += rte_pktmbuf_data_len(mbuf);
>>      /* FIXME: get region index */
>>      d0->region = 1;
>>      d0->offset = rte_pktmbuf_mtod(mbuf, uint8_t *) -
>>
> 
> Looks good to me, but let's wait Jakub's review for it.
> 

Reply via email to