04/05/2021 14:04, Bruce Richardson: > On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:20:40PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 30/04/2021 17:06, Bruce Richardson: > > > Add an explicit padding field to the end of the descriptor structure so > > > that when the batch descriptor is defined on the stack for perform-ops, > > > the > > > unused space is all zeroed appropriately. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richard...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > --- a/drivers/raw/ioat/rte_ioat_rawdev_fns.h > > > +++ b/drivers/raw/ioat/rte_ioat_rawdev_fns.h > > > - /* 28 bytes of padding here */ > > > + uint16_t intr_handle; /* completion interrupt handle */ > > > > This is more than padding. > > Does it deserve its own commit? > > > > This field is unused by the driver, since we don't use any interrupts, so I > consider it as padding in that regard. However, I agree that in reality > it's not padding, but I think rather than having it's own commit, I can > just reword the patch commit log to cover it. Something like: > > raw/ioat: expand descriptor struct to full 64 bytes > > Although it's unused by the driver, add the interrupt handle field in the > descriptor to the descriptor structure for completeness, and explicitly add > the reserved padding field on the end of the structure too. This means that > when a descriptor is defined on the stack, or initialized by the compiler, > the unused/reserved space will be zeroed appropriately.
OK, thanks for adding full explanation in the git history.