Hi Ray, > > @@ -127,6 +127,10 @@ Deprecation Notices > > values to the function ``rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add`` using > > the structure ``rte_event_eth_rx_adapter_queue_add``. > > > > +* eventdev: The function pointer ``ca_enqueue`` in structure > ``rte_eventdev`` > > + will be moved after ``txa_enqueue`` so that all enqueue/dequeue > > + function pointers are adjacent to each other. > > + > > * sched: To allow more traffic classes, flexible mapping of pipe queues to > > traffic classes, and subport level configuration of pipes and queues > > changes will be made to macros, data structures and API functions > defined > > > > I admire the disipline - but since you are not actually removing ca_enqueue, > just moving it in memory when the new ABI is declared in anycase, this is not > required. >
Does it mean we can move elements in a structure without giving deprecation notice? -akhil
