Hi Xueming,
On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 02:23:55PM +0000, Xueming Li wrote:
> Adds a new function to get value of a specific key from kvargs list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xueming Li <xuemi...@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Gaetan Rivet <gr...@u256.net>
> ---
> lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_kvargs/version.map | 3 +++
> 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.c b/lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.c
> index ffae8914cf..40e7670ab3 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_kvargs/rte_kvargs.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,26 @@ rte_kvargs_free(struct rte_kvargs *kvlist)
> free(kvlist);
> }
>
> +/* Lookup a value in an rte_kvargs list by its key. */
> +const char *
> +rte_kvargs_get(const struct rte_kvargs *kvlist, const char *key)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + if (!kvlist)
> + return NULL;
> + for (i = 0; i < kvlist->count; ++i) {
> + /* Allows key to be NULL. */
> + if (!key && !kvlist->pairs[i].key)
> + return kvlist->pairs[i].value;
Is it possible that kvlist->pairs[i].key == NULL? In which case?
Thanks,
Olivier
