On 6/3/2015 8:55 PM, Ouyang, Changchun wrote:
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Huawei Xie
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 2, 2015 9:50 AM
>> To: dev at dpdk.org
>> Cc: Sun, Peng A
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: provide vhost API to unregister vhost
>> unix domain socket
>>
>> rte_vhost_driver_unregister will remove the listenfd from event list, and
>> then close it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Huawei Xie <huawei.xie at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Peng Sun <peng.a.sun at intel.com>
>> ---
>>  lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h            |  3 ++
>>  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_cuse/vhost-net-cdev.c |  9 ++++
>> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.c | 70
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++-----  lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-
>> user.h |  2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
>> b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
>> index 5d38185..5630fbc 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h
>> @@ -188,6 +188,9 @@ int rte_vhost_enable_guest_notification(struct
>> virtio_net *dev, uint16_t queue_i
>>  /* Register vhost driver. dev_name could be different for multiple instance
>> support. */  int rte_vhost_driver_register(const char *dev_name);
>>
>> +/* Unregister vhost driver. This is only meaningful to vhost user. */
>> +int rte_vhost_driver_unregister(const char *dev_name);
>> +
>>  /* Register callbacks. */
>>  int rte_vhost_driver_callback_register(struct virtio_net_device_ops const *
>> const);
>>  /* Start vhost driver session blocking loop. */ diff --git
>> a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_cuse/vhost-net-cdev.c
>> b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_cuse/vhost-net-cdev.c
>> index 6b68abf..1ae7c49 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_cuse/vhost-net-cdev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_cuse/vhost-net-cdev.c
>> @@ -405,6 +405,15 @@ rte_vhost_driver_register(const char *dev_name)  }
>>
>>  /**
>> + * An empty function for unregister
>> + */
>> +int
>> +rte_vhost_driver_unregister(const char *dev_name __rte_unused) {
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>>   * The CUSE session is launched allowing the application to receive open,
>>   * release and ioctl calls.
>>   */
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.c
>> b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.c
>> index 31f1215..dff46ee 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ struct connfd_ctx {
>>  struct _vhost_server {
>>      struct vhost_server *server[MAX_VHOST_SERVER];
>>      struct fdset fdset;
>> +    int vserver_cnt;
>> +    pthread_mutex_t server_mutex;
>>  };
>>
>>  static struct _vhost_server g_vhost_server = { @@ -74,10 +76,10 @@ static
>> struct _vhost_server g_vhost_server = {
>>              .fd_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
>>              .num = 0
>>      },
>> +    .vserver_cnt = 0,
>> +    .server_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER,
>>  };
>>
>> -static int vserver_idx;
>> -
>>  static const char *vhost_message_str[VHOST_USER_MAX] = {
>>      [VHOST_USER_NONE] = "VHOST_USER_NONE",
>>      [VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES] = "VHOST_USER_GET_FEATURES",
>> @@ -427,7 +429,6 @@ vserver_message_handler(int connfd, void *dat, int
>> *remove)
>>      }
>>  }
>>
>> -
>>  /**
>>   * Creates and initialise the vhost server.
>>   */
>> @@ -436,34 +437,79 @@ rte_vhost_driver_register(const char *path)  {
>>      struct vhost_server *vserver;
>>
>> -    if (vserver_idx == 0)
>> +    pthread_mutex_lock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>> +    if (ops == NULL)
>>              ops = get_virtio_net_callbacks();
>> -    if (vserver_idx == MAX_VHOST_SERVER)
>> +
>> +    if (g_vhost_server.vserver_cnt == MAX_VHOST_SERVER) {
>> +            RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>> +                    "error: the number of servers reaches maximum\n");
>> +            pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>>              return -1;
>> +    }
>>
>>      vserver = calloc(sizeof(struct vhost_server), 1);
>> -    if (vserver == NULL)
>> +    if (vserver == NULL) {
>> +            pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>>              return -1;
>> -
>> -    unlink(path);
>> +    }
>>
>>      vserver->listenfd = uds_socket(path);
>>      if (vserver->listenfd < 0) {
>>              free(vserver);
>> +            pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>>              return -1;
>>      }
>> -    vserver->path = path;
>> +
>> +    vserver->path = strdup(path);
> Do we need check if there is existing server which has same path  with the 
> new one?

This is considered. If there is existing server, binding will fail.
>
>>      fdset_add(&g_vhost_server.fdset, vserver->listenfd,
>> -            vserver_new_vq_conn, NULL,
>> -            vserver);
>> +            vserver_new_vq_conn, NULL, vserver);
>>
>> -    g_vhost_server.server[vserver_idx++] = vserver;
>> +    g_vhost_server.server[g_vhost_server.vserver_cnt++] = vserver;
>> +    pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>>
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>
>>
>> +/**
>> + * Unregister the specified vhost server  */ int
>> +rte_vhost_driver_unregister(const char *path) {
>> +    int i;
>> +    int count;
>> +
>> +    pthread_mutex_lock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < g_vhost_server.vserver_cnt; i++) {
>> +            if (!strcmp(g_vhost_server.server[i]->path, path)) {
>> +                    fdset_del(&g_vhost_server.fdset,
>> +                            g_vhost_server.server[i]->listenfd);
>> +
>> +                    close(g_vhost_server.server[i]->listenfd);
> Besides listenfd, do we need check other fd's status, all fds should be 
> closed before driver unregistered. 
No, we don't need. Why do we check other fds? Here we are to unregister 
the listenfd.
>
>> +                    free(g_vhost_server.server[i]->path);
>> +                    free(g_vhost_server.server[i]);
>> +
>> +                    unlink(path);
>> +
>> +                    count = --g_vhost_server.vserver_cnt;
>> +                    g_vhost_server.server[i] =
>> +                            g_vhost_server.server[count];
> it is better to remove the unnecessary new line for easy to read, so does the 
> next 2 lines
Thanks.
>> +                    g_vhost_server.server[count] =
>> +                            NULL;
>> +
>>      pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>> +
>> +                    return 0;
>> +            }
>> +    }
>> +    pthread_mutex_unlock(&g_vhost_server.server_mutex);
>> +
>> +    return -1;
>> +}
> Do we have test case cover this new function?
>
>> +
>>  int
>>  rte_vhost_driver_session_start(void)
>>  {
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.h
>> b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.h
>> index 1b6be6c..2e72f3c 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.h
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user/vhost-net-user.h
>> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
>>  #include "fd_man.h"
>>
>>  struct vhost_server {
>> -    const char *path; /**< The path the uds is bind to. */
>> +    char *path; /**< The path the uds is bind to. */
>>      int listenfd;     /**< The listener sockfd. */
>>  };
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.1.4
>
>

Reply via email to