On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:31 AM, Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz at 6wind.com>
wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 05/29/2015 12:34 PM, Jan Blunck wrote:
> > In rte_log_dump_history() the log_history list is reinitialized without
> > resetting the log_history_size. In the next call to
> rte_log_add_in_history()
> > the log_history_size > RTE_LOG_HISTORY and the code unconditionally tries
> > to remove the first entry:
> >
> > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> > rte_log_add_in_history (
> > buf=buf at entry=0x7f02035cd000 "DATAPLANE: 9:dp0s7 link RTM_NEWLINK
> [dp0s7] <UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,LOWER_UP>\nCAST,LOWER_UP>\n",
> size=size at entry=86)
> > at /usr/src/packages/BUILD/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c:122
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck at infradead.org>
> > ---
> > lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> > index fe3d7d5..cb4311c 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> > @@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ rte_log_add_in_history(const char *buf, size_t size)
> > /* get a buffer for adding in history */
> > if (log_history_size > RTE_LOG_HISTORY) {
> > hist_buf = STAILQ_FIRST(&log_history);
> > - STAILQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&log_history, next);
> > + if (hist_buf)
> > + STAILQ_REMOVE_HEAD(&log_history, next);
>
> Shouldn't we decrease log_history_size here?
>
>
Thanks for catching that one.
>
>
> Also, it's probably a bit off-topic, but I think the function that
> adds in history could be optimized a bit to avoid doing the copy with
> the lock held. Maybe something like this is feasible:
>
> rte_mempool_mc_get() into hist_buf
> memcpy(hist_buf->buf, buf, size);
> rte_spinlock_lock(&log_list_lock
> if (log_history_size > RTE_LOG_HISTORY) {
> STAILQ_REMOVE_HEAD
> log_history_size --
> }
> STAILQ_INSERT_TAIL
> log_history_size ++
> rte_spinlock_unlock(&log_list_lock)
>
> Feel free to implement it if you feel it's better. It would also
> require to increase the number of objects in the pool to
> RTE_LOG_HISTORY*2 + RTE_MAX_LCORE
>
>
Makes sense. I'll take a look into that one later.
Thanks,
Jan
> Regards,
> Olivier
>
>
>
> > }
> > else {
> > if (rte_mempool_mc_get(log_history_mp, &obj) < 0)
> > @@ -234,6 +235,7 @@ rte_log_dump_history(FILE *out)
> > rte_spinlock_lock(&log_list_lock);
> > tmp_log_history = log_history;
> > STAILQ_INIT(&log_history);
> > + log_history_size = 0;
> > rte_spinlock_unlock(&log_list_lock);
> >
> > for (i=0; i<RTE_LOG_HISTORY; i++) {
> >
>
