23/03/2021 19:07, P, Venkata Suresh Kumar:
> Thanks a lot for reviewing the code and providing your comments.
>
> I have addressed below comments in V2 patch.
OK thanks.
What about the question about rte_trace?
Opinions?
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> 19/03/2021 13:02, Venkata Suresh Kumar P:
> > Add the file descriptor input/output port type for the SWX pipeline.
>
> I think it deserves a bit more explanation about what is FD I/O port. --
> [Suresh] - Addressed in V2 patch
>
> > /*
> > + * tap
> > + */
> > +#define TAP_DEV "/dev/net/tun"
>
> Spaces are free :) -- [Suresh] - Addressed in V2 patch
>
>
> > +#ifndef TRACE_LEVEL
> > +#define TRACE_LEVEL 0
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#if TRACE_LEVEL
> > +#define TRACE(...) printf(__VA_ARGS__) #else #define TRACE(...)
> > +#endif
>
> Would you consider rte_trace?
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/lib/librte_port/rte_swx_port_fd.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
> > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> > + * Copyright(c) 2016 Intel Corporation
>
> I guess you did not create it in 2016. -- [Suresh] - Addressed in V2 patch
>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __INCLUDE_RTE_SWX_PORT_FD_H__ #define
> > +__INCLUDE_RTE_SWX_PORT_FD_H__
> > +
> > +#ifdef __cplusplus
> > +extern "C" {
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * @file
> > + * RTE SWX FD Input and Output Ports
> > + *
> > + ***/
>
> Useless blank line. -- [Suresh] - Addressed in V2 patch
>
> [...]
> > +
> > +#ifdef __cplusplus
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#endif
>
> A comment after such a far #endif is better: -- [Suresh] - Addressed in V2
> patch
> /* __INCLUDE_RTE_SWX_PORT_FD_H__ */
>
> > --- a/lib/librte_port/version.map
> > +++ b/lib/librte_port/version.map
> > @@ -48,4 +48,6 @@ EXPERIMENTAL {
> > #added in 21.02
>
> In 21.05
>
> > rte_swx_port_ring_reader_ops;
> > rte_swx_port_ring_writer_ops;
> > + rte_swx_port_fd_reader_ops;
> > + rte_swx_port_fd_writer_ops;
>
> Please sort in alphabetical order. -- [Suresh] - Addressed in V2 patch
