在 2021/3/23 16:07, Ruifeng Wang 写道:
-----Original Message-----
From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Lijun Ou
Sent: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 9:36 AM
To: tho...@monjalon.net; ferruh.yi...@intel.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; linux...@openeuler.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH V2 1/4] config/arm: add Hisilicon kunpeng920
implementer
Here addes Kunpeng920 config back which was deleted.
Fixes: 91c730fd4e09 ("config/arm: remove unused or superfluous variables")
Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <ouli...@huawei.com>
---
V1->V2:
- rewrite patch title.
- split the patch into two.
---
config/arm/meson.build | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/config/arm/meson.build b/config/arm/meson.build index
00bc461..3826900 100644
--- a/config/arm/meson.build
+++ b/config/arm/meson.build
@@ -133,6 +133,25 @@ implementer_cavium = {
}
}
+implementer_hisilicon = {
+ 'description': 'Hisilicon',
+ 'flags': [
+ ['RTE_USE_C11_MEM_MODEL', true],
+ ['RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE', 128],
Just want to double check.
One Kunpeng920 box I can access have cache line size 64B.
I have a question, which level does RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE refer to? For
kunpeng920, L1/L2 cache size is 64B,L3 is 128B
Thanks.
+ ['RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES', 4]
+ ],
+ 'part_number_config': {
+ '0xd01': {
+ 'machine_args': ['-march=armv8.2-a+crypto',
+ '-mtune=tsv110'],
+ 'flag': [['RTE_MACHINE', '"kunpeng920"'],
+ ['RTE_MAX_LCORE', 128],
+ ['RTE_ARM_FEATURE_ATOMICS', true]
+ ]
+ }
+ }
+}
+
implementer_ampere = {
'description': 'Ampere Computing',
'flags': [
@@ -190,6 +209,7 @@ implementers = {
'generic': implementer_generic,
'0x41': implementer_arm,
'0x43': implementer_cavium,
+ '0x48': implementer_hisilicon,
'0x50': implementer_ampere,
'0x51': implementer_qualcomm,
'0x56': implementer_marvell,
--
2.7.4
.