Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@cesnet.cz> > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 9:22 PM > To: Jiawei(Jonny) Wang <jiaw...@nvidia.com> > Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso > <as...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Duplicating traffic with RTE Flow > > Hello Jiawei, > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 09:32:44 +0000 > "Jiawei(Jonny) Wang" <jiaw...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > Hi Jan, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@cesnet.cz> > > > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2021 12:33 AM > > > To: Jiawei(Jonny) Wang <jiaw...@nvidia.com> > > > Cc: Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso > > > <as...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com> > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Duplicating traffic with RTE Flow > > > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 02:11:07 +0000 > > > "Jiawei(Jonny) Wang" <jiaw...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Jan, > > > > > > > > Sorry for late response, > > > > > > > > First rule is invalid, port only works on FDB domain so need > > > > 'transfer' here; Second rule should be ok, could you please check > > > > if the > > > port 1 was enabled on you dpdk application? > > > > > > I assume that it is enabled, see full transcript: > > > > > > $ ofed_info > > > MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.2-1.0.4.0 (OFED-5.2-1.0.4): > > > ... > > > $ sudo dpdk-testpmd -v -- -i > > > EAL: Detected 24 lcore(s) > > > EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes > > > EAL: RTE Version: 'DPDK 20.11.0' > > > EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket > > > EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'PA' > > > EAL: No available hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB > > > EAL: Probing VFIO support... > > > EAL: Probe PCI driver: mlx5_pci (15b3:1017) device: 0000:04:00.0 > > > (socket 0) > > > mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. > > > mlx5_pci: Size 0xFFFF is not power of 2, will be aligned to 0x10000. > > > EAL: Probe PCI driver: mlx5_pci (15b3:1017) device: 0000:04:00.1 > > > (socket 0) > > > mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. > > > mlx5_pci: Size 0xFFFF is not power of 2, will be aligned to 0x10000. > > > EAL: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created > > > Interactive-mode selected > > > testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mb_pool_0>: n=331456, size=2176, > > > socket=0 > > > testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc Configuring > > > Port 0 (socket 0) Port 0: B8:59:9F:E2:09:F6 Configuring Port 1 (socket > > > 0) > Port 1: > > > B8:59:9F:E2:09:F7 Checking link statuses... > > > Done > > > > Seems that you start two PF port here, Port 1 is not VF port; FDB > > rule can steering the packet form PF to its VFs and vice versa, Could > > you please try to open the VF ports and start the testpmd with > representor=. > > I did not know this, so I tried with VFs: > > # echo 2 > /sys/class/net/hge1/device/sriov_numvfs > # echo switchdev > /sys/class/net/hge1/compat/devlink/mode > > # dpdk-testpmd -v -a '0000:05:00.1,representor=[0-1]' -- -i > EAL: Detected 24 lcore(s) > EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes > EAL: RTE Version: 'DPDK 20.11.0' > EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/rte/mp_socket > EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'VA' > EAL: No available hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB > EAL: Probing VFIO support... > EAL: Probe PCI driver: mlx5_pci (15b3:1017) device: 0000:05:00.1 (socket 0) > mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. > mlx5_pci: Size 0xFFFF is not power of 2, will be aligned to 0x10000. > mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. > mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. > EAL: No legacy callbacks, legacy socket not created Interactive-mode > selected > testpmd: create a new mbuf pool <mb_pool_0>: n=331456, size=2176, > socket=0 > testpmd: preferred mempool ops selected: ring_mp_mc > > Warning! port-topology=paired and odd forward ports number, the last port > will pair with itself. > > Configuring Port 0 (socket 0) > Port 0: B8:59:9F:E2:09:F7 > Configuring Port 1 (socket 0) > Port 1: B2:57:D6:72:F3:31 > Configuring Port 2 (socket 0) > Port 2: 9E:CB:D0:73:59:CE > Checking link statuses... > Done > testpmd> show port summary all > Number of available ports: 3 > Port MAC Address Name Driver Status Link > 0 B8:59:9F:E2:09:F7 0000:05:00.1 mlx5_pci up 100 Gbps > 1 B2:57:D6:72:F3:31 0000:05:00.1_representor_0 mlx5_pci up 100 > Gbps > 2 9E:CB:D0:73:59:CE 0000:05:00.1_representor_1 mlx5_pci up 100 > Gbps > testpmd> set sample_actions 0 port_id id 1 / end testpmd> flow validate 0 > ingress transfer pattern end actions sample ratio 1 index 0 / drop / end > port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 1 (cause unspecified): sample > action not supported: Operation not supported > > Still no luck. However, there is this message 3-times in the log: > > mlx5_pci: No available register for Sampler. > > It looks like it might be related. What does it mean? > Yes, the error message means that can't find available sampler register, and this value is fetched from the FW; Seems that you use the older FW, the OFED version 5.2-1.0.4 is ok, but FW isn't match with this OFED version. Thanks. Jonny > Jan > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > testpmd> port start 1 > > > Port 1 is now not stopped > > > Please stop the ports first > > > Done > > > testpmd> set sample_actions 0 port_id id 1 / end testpmd> flow > > > validate 0 ingress transfer pattern end actions sample ratio 1 index > > > 0 / drop / end > > > port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 1 (cause unspecified): > > > (no stated reason): Operation not supported testpmd> flow create 0 > > > ingress transfer pattern end actions sample ratio 1 index 0 / drop / > > > end > > > port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 1 (cause unspecified): > > > (no stated reason): Operation not supported testpmd> Stopping port 0... > > > Stopping ports... > > > Done > > > > > > Stopping port 1... > > > Stopping ports... > > > Done > > > > > > Shutting down port 0... > > > Closing ports... > > > Port 0 is closed > > > Done > > > > > > Shutting down port 1... > > > Closing ports... > > > Port 1 is closed > > > Done > > > > > > Bye... > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Jonny > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@cesnet.cz> > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 10:43 PM > > > > > To: Slava Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com> > > > > > Cc: Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam > > > > > <or...@nvidia.com>; Jiawei(Jonny) Wang <jiaw...@nvidia.com> > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Duplicating traffic with RTE Flow > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:34:07 +0000 Slava Ovsiienko > > > > > <viachesl...@nvidia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi, Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > To use port action (I see it is in your sample action list) > > > > > > the flow should be applied to the FDB domain, ie "transfer" > > > > > > attribute should be > > > > > specified: > > > > > > > > > > > > flow validate 0 ingress transfer... > > > > > > > > > > As you can see (however, it's a bit messy in the response below, > > > > > in [1], it is better), I tried both. First without transfer and > > > > > second with. The first gives hint "action is valid in transfer mode > > > > > only" > > > > > but the second try with transfer gives "Operation not supported". > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > [1] http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2021-March/200475.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > With best regards, Slava > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Jan Viktorin <vikto...@cesnet.cz> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 14:21 > > > > > > > To: Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com> > > > > > > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Ori Kam <or...@nvidia.com>; Jiawei(Jonny) > > > > > > > Wang <jiaw...@nvidia.com>; Slava Ovsiienko > > > > > > > <viachesl...@nvidia.com> > > > > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Duplicating traffic with RTE Flow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Asaf, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is a while we were in touch regarding this topic. > > > > > > > Finally, I am again trying to get work this feature. I've > > > > > > > seen that sampling is already upstreamed which is great. > > > > > > > However, I am not very successful with that. There is nearly > > > > > > > no documentation, just [1], I found no examples, > > > > > just commit logs... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > set sample_actions 0 port_id id 1 / end > flow validate > > > > > > > 0 ingress pattern end actions sample ratio 1 index 0 / drop > > > > > > > / end > > > > > > > port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 1 (cause > unspecified): > > > > > > > port id action is valid in transfer mode only: Operation not > > > > > > > supported > flow validate > > > > > > > 0 ingress transfer pattern end actions sample ratio 1 index > > > > > > > 0 / drop / end > > > > > > > port_flow_complain(): Caught PMD error type 1 (cause > unspecified): > > > > > > > (no stated reason): Operation not supported > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Using CentOS 7, DPDK 20.11.0, OFED-5.2-1.0.4. > > > > > > > NICs: MT2892 Family [ConnectX-6 Dx] 101d (fw 22.28.1002), > > > > > > > MT27800 Family [ConnectX-5] 1017 (fw 16.27.2008). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My primary goal is to be able to deliver exactly the same > > > > > > > packets both to DPDK and to the Linux kernel. Doing this at > > > > > > > RTE Flow level would be great due to performance and > transparency. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/rte_flow.html#action- > > > > > > > samp > > > > > > > le > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 14:23:42 +0000 Asaf Penso > > > > > > > <as...@nvidia.com> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hello Jan, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can have a look in series [1] where we propose to add > > > > > > > > APIs to > > > > > > > DPDK20.11 for both mirroring and sampling for packets, with > > > > > > > additional actions of the different traffic. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > http://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=12045 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > Asaf Penso > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > >From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Jan > > > > > > > > >Viktorin > > > > > > > > >Sent: Friday, September 18, 2020 3:56 PM > > > > > > > > >To: dev@dpdk.org > > > > > > > > >Subject: [dpdk-dev] Duplicating traffic with RTE Flow > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Hello all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >we are looking for a way to duplicate ingress traffic in > > > > > > > > >hardware. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >There is an example in [1] suggesting to insert two fate > > > > > > > > >actions into the RTE Flow actions array like: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flow create 0 ingress pattern end \ > > > > > > > > > actions queue index 0 / void / queue index 1 / end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >But our experience is that PMDs reject two fate actions > > > > > > > > >(tried with mlx5). Another similar approach would be to > > > > > > > > >deliver every single packet into two virtual > > > > > > > > >functions: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flow create 0 ingress pattern end \ > > > > > > > > > actions vf index 0 / vf index 1 / end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Third possibility was to use passthru: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flow create 0 ingress pattern end \ > > > > > > > > > actions passthru / vf index 0 / end flow create 0 > > > > > > > > > ingress pattern end \ > > > > > > > > > actions vf index 1 / end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Again, tried on mlx5 and it does not support the passthru. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Last idea was to use isolate with passthru (to deliver > > > > > > > > >both to DPDK application and to the kernel) but again > > > > > > > > >there was no support on mlx5 for > > > > > > > passthru... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > flow isolate 0 true > > > > > > > > > flow create 0 ingress pattern end actions passthru / > > > > > > > > > rss end / end > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Is there any other possibility or PMD+NIC that is known > > > > > > > > >to solve such > > > > > > > issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Thanks > > > > > > > > >Jan Viktorin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >[1] > > > > > > > > >https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https > > > > > > > > >%3A% > > > > > > > > >2F% > > > > > 2 > > > > > > > > >Fdoc > > > > > > > > >.dpdk > > > > > > > > >.org%2Fguides%2Fprog_guide%2Frte_flow.html%23table-rte- > fl > > > > > > > > >ow- > > > > > redir > > > > > > > > >ect- > > > > > > > > >queue-5- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >3&data=02%7C01%7Casafp%40nvidia.com%7C1a46005bec5 > 245 > > > e72 > > > > > 9e70 > > > > > > > 8d > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >85bd24caf%7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7 > C6 > > > 373 > > > > > 6030 > > > > > > > 60 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >73519816&sdata=EOF%2Fz62crvBZK8rwzwKIWxj5cVlfPVnU3 > FLm > > > cL9 > > > > > X2w0 > > > > > > > %3 > > > > > > > > >D&reserved=0 > > > > > > > > > > > >
