On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 2:36 PM Feifei Wang <feifei.wa...@arm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Jerin
>
> Sorry to disturb you. Would you please help review this patch when you are
> free?
Sure. See below.
> Thanks very much.
>
> Best Regards
> Feifei
>
> > -----邮件原件-----
> > 发件人: Feifei Wang <feifei.wa...@arm.com>
> > 发送时间: 2021年2月25日 17:32
> > 收件人: jer...@marvell.com; Sunil Kumar Kori <sk...@marvell.com>; David
> > Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> > 抄送: dev@dpdk.org; nd <n...@arm.com>; Feifei Wang
> > <feifei.wa...@arm.com>; sta...@dpdk.org; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Honnappa Nagarahalli
> > <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>; Ruifeng Wang
> > <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
> > 主题: [PATCH v2 1/1] app/test: collect perf data after worker threads exit
> >
> > The measure_perf function should be executed after worker threads exit to
> > collect correct perf data. Otherwise, while workers are running, the main
> > thread may get incomplete data from workers.
> >
> > In the meanwhile, remove unnecessary barrier in the test.
> > For signal variables "ldata.done" and "ldata.start", no operations should
> > keep
> > the order that being executed after them. So the wmb after them can be
> > moved.
> >
> > Fixes: 16a277a24c9f ("test/trace: add performance test cases")
> > Cc: jer...@marvell.com
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Suggested-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wa...@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.w...@arm.com>
Please change to test/trace: ....
The rest looks good to me.
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_trace_perf.c | 5 ++---
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_trace_perf.c b/app/test/test_trace_perf.c index
> > e1ad8e6f5..46ae7d807 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_trace_perf.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_trace_perf.c
> > @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ signal_workers_to_finish(struct test_data *data)
> >
> > for (workers = 0; workers < data->nb_workers; workers++) {
> > data->ldata[workers].done = 1;
> > - rte_smp_wmb();
> > }
> > }
> >
> > @@ -102,7 +101,6 @@ worker_fn_##func(void *arg) \ { \
> > struct lcore_data *ldata = arg; \
> > ldata->started = 1; \
> > - rte_smp_wmb(); \
> > __worker_##func(ldata); \
> > return 0; \
> > }
> > @@ -137,11 +135,12 @@ run_test(const char *str, lcore_function_t f, struct
> > test_data *data, size_t sz)
> >
> > wait_till_workers_are_ready(data);
> > rte_delay_ms(100); /* Wait for some time to accumulate the stats */
> > - measure_perf(str, data);
> > signal_workers_to_finish(data);
> >
> > RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(id)
> > rte_eal_wait_lcore(id);
> > +
> > + measure_perf(str, data);
> > }
> >
> > static int
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
