On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 11:10:01 +0300 Igor Ryzhov <iryz...@nfware.com> wrote:
> Stephen, > > No, I don't have a better proposal, but I think it is not correct to change > the behavior of KNI (making link down without a real response). > Even though we know that communicating with userspace under rtnl_lock is a > bad idea, it works as it is for many years already. > > Elad, > > I agree with you that KNI should be removed from the main tree if it is not > possible to fix this __dev_close_many issue. > There were discussions about this multiple times already, but no one is > working on this AFAIK. > Last time the discussion was a month ago: > https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@dpdk.org/msg196033.html > > Igor The better proposal would be to make DPDK virtio smarter. There already is virtio devices that must handle this (VDPA) etc. And when you can control link through virtio, then put a big warning in KNI that says "Don't use this"
