On 2021/2/19 16:52, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 2/9/2021 2:51 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 1/29/2021 3:18 AM, 谢华伟(此时此刻) wrote:
From: "huawei.xhw" <huawei....@alibaba-inc.com>

With IO BAR, we get PIO(programmed IO) address.
With MMIO BAR, we get mapped virtual address.
We distinguish PIO(Programmed IO) and MMIO(memory mapped IO) by their address like how kernel does.
ioread/write8/16/32 is provided to access PIO/MMIO.
By the way, for virtio on arch other than x86, BAR flag indicates PIO but is mapped.

Signed-off-by: huawei xie <huawei....@alibaba-inc.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>

<...>

+static inline void iowrite8(uint8_t val, void *addr)
+{
+    (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)addr >= PIO_MAX ?
+        *(volatile uint8_t *)addr = val :
+        outb(val, (unsigned long)addr);

Is the 'outb_p' to 'outb' conversion intentional? And if so why?

Same of the all 'outb_p', 'outw_p', 'outl_p'.


Reminder of above question.

Let's try to close this patch before release pressure hit again.
And as far as I understand already a new version is required for build errors on non x86 architectures.

I will check how to fix the arch issue.


<...>

              size = 1;
-#if defined(RTE_ARCH_X86)
-            outb_p(*s, reg);
-#else
-            *(volatile uint8_t *)reg = *s;
-#endif
+            iowrite8(*s, (void *)reg);
          }
      }
  }


Reply via email to