On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 11:48 AM Ibtisam Tariq <ibtisam.ta...@emumba.com> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 2:59 PM David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> > wrote: >> >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2021 at 8:34 AM Ibtisam Tariq <ibtisam.ta...@emumba.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Instead of using getopt_long return value, strcmp was used to >> > compare the input parameters with the struct option array. This >> > patch get rid of all those strcmp by directly binding each longopt >> > with an int enum. This is to improve readability and consistency in >> > all examples. >> > >> > Bugzilla ID: 238 >> > Cc: marko.kovace...@intel.com >> > >> > Reported-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Ibtisam Tariq <ibtisam.ta...@emumba.com> >> >> For such a series, please provide a cover letter, this is easier when >> replying on the whole series (and for me when applying).
Please do not top post. > Thanks for the recommendation. In future, I will add a cover letter for a > long patch set. > If you want, I can submit the cover letter for this patch set too. No need to send a new revision just for this, thanks. -- David Marchand
