<snip> > > Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech> writes: > > > Remove x86 jobs for which we don't have Travis credits. Leave arm64 > > jobs for which we do have the credits. > > > > Signed-off-by: Juraj Linkeš <juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech> > > --- > > Individual developers will still derive benefit from those jobs, yes? I > thought > it was possible to use travis still for individual developer accounts. If > that's > true, then we shouldn't remove these jobs. +1
- [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs update a... Juraj Linkeš
- [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci: remove x86 Tra... Juraj Linkeš
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci: remove... Thomas Monjalon
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci: re... Aaron Conole
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci... Honnappa Nagarahalli
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci: remove... Aaron Conole
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 1/2] ci: re... Honnappa Nagarahalli
- [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 2/2] ci: update arm64 T... Juraj Linkeš
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs... Ferruh Yigit
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI ... Aaron Conole
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis... Honnappa Nagarahalli
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI jobs... Honnappa Nagarahalli
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Travis CI ... Juraj Linkeš
- [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: update arm64 Travis jo... Juraj Linkeš
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: update arm64 T... Ruifeng Wang
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: update arm64 T... Aaron Conole
- Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ci: update arm... Juraj Linkeš