On February 3, 2021 2:08 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 1/22/2021 9:47 AM, Jiawen Wu wrote: > > This patch adds txgbevf PMD as a part of txgbe PMD. > > > > Jiawen Wu (20): > > net/txgbe: add ethdev probe and remove for VF device > > net/txgbe: add base code for VF driver > > net/txgbe: support add and remove VF device MAC address > > net/txgbe: get VF device information > > net/txgbe: add interrupt operation for VF device > > net/txgbe: get link status of VF device > > net/txgbe: add Rx and Tx unit init for VF device > > net/txgbe: add VF device stats and xstats get operation > > net/txgbe: add VLAN handle support to VF driver > > net/txgbe: add RSS support for VF device > > net/txgbe: add VF device promiscuous and allmulticast mode > > net/txgbe: support multicast MAC filter for VF driver > > net/txgbe: support to update MTU on VF device > > net/txgbe: support register dump on VF device > > net/txgbe: start and stop VF device > > net/txgbe: add some supports as PF driver implemented > > net/txgbe: support VF representor > > net/txgbe: hardware support for VF representor > > net/txgbe: support VLAN filter for VF representor > > doc: update release note for txgbe > > > > Hi Jiawen, > > I put some comments on some patches, can you please send a new version > with updates? > > And I want to note that it is specially hard to review this PMD because it is > clone of complete and complex ixgbe driver. > So most of the code is already ready, we are tying to structure it logically > for > upstreaming it but it is not possible to review the details of this much > feature in > this short time. > > For those feature we are relying on the Wangxun to test all these features, > and > to confirm this, can it be possible for Wangxun to send some test results for > this release? >
Hi Ferruh, Should I provide test results of PF part applied to the main repo, and VF part with some modifications? I mean, the latest version that I format the patches. > Similar to those reports: > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/84436/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/84500/ > https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/84517/ > Those reports show the NICs supported platforms. All features in dts report don't to be needed, do they? > > Also quick test results for the -rc2 & -rc3 can be very helpful, if you can > provide, > like: > http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/c2bd98a6da8d4955b19b8838c9bf6...@intel.com/# > t > http://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/92ce632a-dc21-f50c-d4d6-85e7961b6...@linux.vne > t.ibm.com/#t > > Thanks, > ferruh
