Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 10:44 AM
> To: Subhi Masri <sub...@nvidia.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; n...@arm.com; Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com>;
> david.march...@redhat.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
> ruifeng.w...@arm.com; i.maxim...@ovn.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net/virtio: fix compiling issue for vectorized NEON
> path
>
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Hi Subhi,
>
> On 1/26/21 10:57 AM, Joyce Kong wrote:
> > In file included from ../drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed.c:22:0:
> > ../drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h: In function
> > ‘virtqueue_enqueue_batch_packed_vec’:
> > ../drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h:74:2: warning:
> > implicit declaration of function ‘vreinterpretq_p128_u32’
> > [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> > poly128_t cmp1 = vreinterpretq_p128_u32(~vceqq_u32(ref_seg,
> > def_ref_seg)); ^
> >
> > The message shows ‘vreinterpretq_p128_u32’ intrinsic is not supported
> > because an old version gcc (gcc 4.8.5) is used. So fix the issue with
> > implementing the logic with other intrinsics.
> >
> > Bugzilla ID: 621
> > Fixes: 530887469350 ("net/virtio: add vectorized packed ring NEON Tx")
> > Fixes: 5971ce5e2a59 ("net/virtio: add vectorized packed ring NEON Rx")
> >
> > Reported-by: Subhi Masri <sub...@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.k...@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h | 8 ++++----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h
> > b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h
> > index 01c77b712..00dd04277 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx_packed_neon.h
> > @@ -71,8 +71,8 @@ virtqueue_enqueue_batch_packed_vec(struct
> virtnet_tx *txvq,
> > uint32x4_t def_ref_seg = vdupq_n_u32(0x10001);
> > /* Check refcnt and nb_segs. */
> > uint32x4_t ref_seg = vreinterpretq_u32_u8(vqtbl2q_u8(mbuf,
> ref_seg_msk));
> > - poly128_t cmp1 = vreinterpretq_p128_u32(~vceqq_u32(ref_seg,
> def_ref_seg));
> > - if (unlikely(cmp1))
> > + uint64x2_t cmp1 = vreinterpretq_u64_u32(~vceqq_u32(ref_seg,
> def_ref_seg));
> > + if (unlikely(vgetq_lane_u64(cmp1, 0) || vgetq_lane_u64(cmp1,
> > + 1)))
> > return -1;
> >
> > /* Check headroom is enough. */
> > @@ -225,10 +225,10 @@ virtqueue_dequeue_batch_packed_vec(struct
> virtnet_rx *rxvq,
> > if (vq->vq_packed.used_wrap_counter)
> > v_used_flag = vdupq_n_u32(PACKED_FLAGS_MASK);
> >
> > - poly128_t desc_stats = vreinterpretq_p128_u32(~vceqq_u32(v_flag,
> v_used_flag));
> > + uint64x2_t desc_stats = vreinterpretq_u64_u32(~vceqq_u32(v_flag,
> > + v_used_flag));
> >
> > /* Check all descs are used. */
> > - if (desc_stats)
> > + if (unlikely(vgetq_lane_u64(desc_stats, 0) ||
> > + vgetq_lane_u64(desc_stats, 1)))
> > return -1;
> >
> > /* Load 2 mbuf pointers per time. */
> >
>
> Can you confirm the patch works for you?
>
Yes it does , you can add my tag.
Tested-by: Subhi Masri <sub...@nvidia.com>
> Thanks,
> Maxime
Regards,
Subhi Masri
