Hi Kevin, > -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com> > Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2021 6:55 PM > To: Ali Alnubani <alia...@nvidia.com>; sta...@dpdk.org > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David > Christensen <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin > Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; > Ju-Hyoung Lee <juh...@microsoft.com>; Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; > Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; pingx...@intel.com; > qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh <rasl...@mellanox.com>; NBU- > Contact-Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>; yuan.p...@intel.com; > zhaoyan.c...@intel.com; hariprasad.govindhara...@intel.com; Slava > Ovsiienko <viachesl...@nvidia.com>; Asaf Penso <as...@nvidia.com> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test > > On 14/01/2021 15:11, Ali Alnubani wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Hi Ali, > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: stable <stable-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Kevin Traynor > >> Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 2:03 PM > >> To: sta...@dpdk.org > >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe > <abhishek.mara...@microsoft.com>; > >> Akhil Goyal <akhil.go...@nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani > >> <alia...@mellanox.com>; benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David Christensen > >> <d...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; Hemant Agrawal > <hemant.agra...@nxp.com>; > >> Ian Stokes <ian.sto...@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jer...@marvell.com>; > >> John McNamara <john.mcnam...@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee > >> <juh...@microsoft.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktray...@redhat.com>; Luca > >> Boccassi <bl...@debian.org>; Pei Zhang <pezh...@redhat.com>; > >> pingx...@intel.com; qian.q...@intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh > >> <rasl...@mellanox.com>; NBU- Contact-Thomas Monjalon > >> <tho...@monjalon.net>; yuan.p...@intel.com; > zhaoyan.c...@intel.com; > >> hariprasad.govindhara...@intel.com > >> Subject: [dpdk-stable] 18.11.11 (LTS) patches review and test > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.11. > >> > >> The planned date for the final release is 19th January. > >> > >> Note, this is the last planned release of 18.11 LTS, and it will be > >> unmaintained after this release, so I encourage anyone who is using > >> 18.11 LTS to test. > >> > >> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report > >> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > >> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes. > >> > > > > The following covers the functional tests that we ran on Mellanox > hardware for this release: > > - Basic functionality: > > Send and receive multiple types of traffic. > > - testpmd xstats counter tests. > > - testpmd timestamp tests. > > - Changing/checking link status through testpmd. > > - RTE flow and flow_director tests. > > - Some RSS tests. > > - VLAN stripping and insertion tests. > > - Checksum and TSO tests. > > - ptype tests. > > - l3fwd-power example application tests. > > - Multi-process example applications tests. > > > > Functional tests ran on: > > - NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: RHEL7.4 / Driver: > > MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.2-1.0.4.0 / Firmware: 14.29.1016 > > - NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: RHEL7.4 / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.2-1.0.4.0 > > / Firmware: 16.29.1016 > > > > Thanks for your testing. > > > We don't see any issues introduced by the new changes in this release, > however, we found the following issues while testing due to environment > changes: > > - Bug 615 - testpmd gets stuck when deleting an FDIR flow - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D615&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681676672%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=4DWeo1yuZd7Y1%2BgfkX4vkTQGkrqtYLPFR > 4KBTb2J5Us%3D&reserved=0 - Won't fix. > > - Bug 616 - [mlx5] packet does not match a corresponding rte_flow rule due > to inner ether_type spec validation - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D616&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681686667%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=EzIwmXI5Fd9o2AA33sU26MNrYOBbgTugfh > Cm0gHFzEA%3D&reserved=0 - Won't fix. > > - Bug 617 - [mlx5] packet does not match a corresponding rte_flow rule due > to vxlan vni spec validation - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D617&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681686667%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=dCdR2epT0kOoTXs%2B2hrOZeTBtMI8jVHP6 > uKYKtTzbkA%3D&reserved=0 - Won't fix. > > We can put these in the known issues section of the release notes. > > > - Bug 618 - [mlx5] secondary process fails to start - > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs > .dpdk.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D618&data=04%7C01%7Calialnu%4 > 0nvidia.com%7C0697f1840c024f99d82908d8b8ad45a0%7C43083d15727340c1b > 7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637462401681686667%7CUnknown%7CTWFp > bGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVC > I6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=Akc9dviCGiCfqbuFJZLbsC8%2BU394q9jYOKr > fbOZlBXk%3D&reserved=0 - We are still looking into this. > > > > Ok, I'll keep an eye on the Bz and please add me on Cc: if there are patches > to fix it and I can run them through the 18.11 build checks etc. >
Ran all my tests again on latest (660b995) and didn't see any new issues. Thanks, Ali
