Hi All, I was finally able to reproduce the issue, but on x86_64 machine with 32 cores.
You can find a patch fixing it here: https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20210119035910.8324-1-l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com/T/#t Best regards Lukasz W dniu 11.01.2021 o 15:19, Lincoln Lavoie pisze: > Hi Jerin, > > There is a process for this defined. A maintainer should open a BUG > for the CI lab, requesting specific tests or test cases be disabled, > as it's a known failure being worked on. Once the test is disabled, > the bug will be updated / assigned back to the maintainer, and should > not be closed until the issue is fixed and the test can be > re-enabled. This is so we don't lose track of anything. > > Cheers, > Lincoln > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:05 AM Jerin Jacob <jerinjac...@gmail.com > <mailto:jerinjac...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:28 PM Lincoln Lavoie > <lylav...@iol.unh.edu <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > How do you want us to handle this in the lab? Can we pull / > disable this unit test from the arm system, ignore it from now > (if it's going to be fixed), disable the unit tests on arm for > now (while it's being fixed)? > > > > Maybe it is better to have a "known issue" based skip mechanism to > address this in CI. > > > Cheers, > LIncoln > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 8:54 AM Jerin Jacob > <jerinjac...@gmail.com <mailto:jerinjac...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:38 PM David Marchand > <david.march...@redhat.com > <mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > > Hey guys, > > > > On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:14 AM David Marchand > > <david.march...@redhat.com > <mailto:david.march...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > > UNH CI is raising failures on a ARM server for the > distributor test: > > > > https://lab.dpdk.org/results/dashboard/patchsets/15077/ > > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=8a9fba02-d504834f-8a9e314d-0cc47aa8f5ba-6a770aebaf9cc635&q=1&e=342f3a9f-26e9-459f-b456-e4c0f24f9551&u=https%3A%2F%2Flab.dpdk.org%2Fresults%2Fdashboard%2Fpatchsets%2F15077%2F> > > > > > > Worker 59 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 60 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 61 handled 0 packets > > > Worker 62 handled 0 packets > > > Sanity test with non-zero hashes done > > > === testing big burst (burst) === > > > line 258: Missing packets, expected 783 > > > Test Failed > > > RTE>> > > > --- stderr --- > > > > Looking at the dashboard, I did not see a passing > instance of this > > unit test for ARM. > > Did it ever work? > > No. There are a lot of sync barriers are missing in the > distributor library. > Since evendev is kind of replacing this library, we made > the fix as > low priority. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > David Marchand > > > > > > -- > *Lincoln Lavoie* > Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies > 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 > lylav...@iol.unh.edu <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu> > https://www.iol.unh.edu > > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=02515c2d-5dca6560-0250d762-0cc47aa8f5ba-f4d7765d9763c114&q=1&e=342f3a9f-26e9-459f-b456-e4c0f24f9551&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iol.unh.edu%2F> > +1-603-674-2755 (m) > > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=75833b33-2a18027e-7582b07c-0cc47aa8f5ba-f87ac679cb8c13d6&q=1&e=342f3a9f-26e9-459f-b456-e4c0f24f9551&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iol.unh.edu%2F> > > > > -- > *Lincoln Lavoie* > Senior Engineer, Broadband Technologies > 21 Madbury Rd., Ste. 100, Durham, NH 03824 > lylav...@iol.unh.edu <mailto:lylav...@iol.unh.edu> > https://www.iol.unh.edu > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=b09c268b-ef071fc6-b09dadc4-0cc47aa8f5ba-8682c86b1454963d&q=1&e=342f3a9f-26e9-459f-b456-e4c0f24f9551&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iol.unh.edu%2F> > +1-603-674-2755 (m) > <https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=75edce14-2a76f759-75ec455b-0cc47aa8f5ba-ef8e65dee33787c3&q=1&e=342f3a9f-26e9-459f-b456-e4c0f24f9551&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.iol.unh.edu%2F> -- Lukasz Wojciechowski Principal Software Engineer Samsung R&D Institute Poland Samsung Electronics Office +48 22 377 88 25 l.wojciec...@partner.samsung.com
