Hi Thomas,
On 07/20/2015 03:00 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Please Olivier, > What is the status of this patch? >From what I remember, the last mail was a comment from Konstantin on another thread (but same topic): http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-May/017633.html Regards, Olivier > > 2015-05-12 01:15, Paul Emmerich: >> this improves the throughput of a simple tx-only application by 11% in >> the full-featured ixgbe tx path and by 14% in the simple tx path. >> --- >> lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h | 1 + >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >> >> diff --git a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h >> index ab6de67..f6895b4 100644 >> --- a/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h >> +++ b/lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h >> @@ -538,6 +538,7 @@ static inline struct rte_mbuf >> *__rte_mbuf_raw_alloc(struct rte_mempool *mp) >> if (rte_mempool_get(mp, &mb) < 0) >> return NULL; >> m = (struct rte_mbuf *)mb; >> + rte_prefetch0(&m->cacheline1); >> RTE_MBUF_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(m) == 0); >> rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(m, 1); >> return (m); >> > >
