On 1/6/21 5:18 PM, David Marchand wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:15 PM Maxime Coquelin
> <maxime.coque...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> This patch finalizes the bus isolation part of this
>> refactoring.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coque...@redhat.com>
>> ---
> 
> [snip]
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h b/drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h
>> index 6c1df6f8e5..9274c48080 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h
>> @@ -449,11 +449,11 @@ virtqueue_full(const struct virtqueue *vq)
>>  }
>>
>>  static inline int
>> -virtio_get_queue_type(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx)
>> +virtio_get_queue_type(struct virtio_hw *hw, uint16_t vq_idx)
>>  {
>> -       if (vtpci_queue_idx == hw->max_queue_pairs * 2)
>> +       if (vq_idx == hw->max_queue_pairs * 2)
>>                 return VTNET_CQ;
>> -       else if (vtpci_queue_idx % 2 == 0)
>> +       else if (vq_idx % 2 == 0)
>>                 return VTNET_RQ;
>>         else
>>                 return VTNET_TQ;
>> --
>> 2.29.2
>>
> 
> I noticed:
> drivers/net/virtio/virtqueue.h: uint16_t  vq_queue_index;   /**< PCI
> queue index */
> 
> Worth cleaning while at it?

I removed the comment, it is self-explanatory.

Thanks,
Maxime

> Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
> 
> 
> 
> Same comment as Chenbo, this is a great cleanup so far.
> I'll look at the rest of the series probably tomorrow.
> 

Reply via email to