> On 13-Jan-21 1:01 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > > >> > >> Instead of passing around pointers and integers, collect everything > >> into struct. This makes API design around these intrinsics much easier. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com> > >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com> > >> --- > >> > >> Notes: > >> v16: > >> - Add error handling > > > > There are few trivial checkpatch warnings, please check > > > > To paraphrase Nick Fury, I recognize that checkpatch has produced > warnings, but given that i don't agree with what checkpatch has to say > in this case, I've elected to ignore it :) > > In particular, these warnings related to comments around struct members, > which i think i've made to look nice and also took care of correct > indentation in terms of code looking the same way with different tab > widths. So, i don't think it should be changed, unless you're suggesting > to re-layout comments on top of each member, rather than at the side > (which i think is more readable).
If top is not an option, it is possible to move comment on next after actual field lines: uint32_t x; /**< * blah, blah * blah, blah, blah */ AFAIK that would keep checkpatch happy.