> On 13-Jan-21 1:01 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> Instead of passing around pointers and integers, collect everything
> >> into struct. This makes API design around these intrinsics much easier.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.bura...@intel.com>
> >> Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.anan...@intel.com>
> >> ---
> >>
> >> Notes:
> >>      v16:
> >>      - Add error handling
> >
> > There are few trivial checkpatch warnings, please check
> >
> 
> To paraphrase Nick Fury, I recognize that checkpatch has produced
> warnings, but given that i don't agree with what checkpatch has to say
> in this case, I've elected to ignore it :)
> 
> In particular, these warnings related to comments around struct members,
> which i think i've made to look nice and also took care of correct
> indentation in terms of code looking the same way with different tab
> widths. So, i don't think it should be changed, unless you're suggesting
> to re-layout comments on top of each member, rather than at the side
> (which i think is more readable).

If top is not an option, it is possible to move comment on next after actual 
field lines:
        uint32_t x;
        /**<
         * blah, blah
         * blah, blah, blah
         */
AFAIK that would keep checkpatch happy.

Reply via email to