On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:58:06AM +0100, David Marchand wrote:
> External Email
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 8:03 PM Harman Kalra <hka...@marvell.com> wrote:
> >
> > In l3fwd no of transmit queues is calculated based on no of
> > lcores with which it is launched. Hence maximum no of tx
> > queues possible per port should depend on RTE_MAX_LCORE value.
>
> For the title, we are not "fixing" the Tx queue count.
> WDYT of:
> examples/l3fwd: remove limitation on Tx queue count
Hi David
Thanks for reviewing, I will push V2 with the required changes.
>
> >
> > Fixes: 268888b5b020 ("examples/l3fwd: modularize")
>
> This commit simply moves code around, so it is unlikely to be the origin.
> Afaiu, this behavior has been present since the start.
> I'd rather flag
>
> Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
>
> > Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Harman Kalra <hka...@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > examples/l3fwd/main.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/main.c b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> > index d62dec434..bb49e5faf 100644
> > --- a/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> > +++ b/examples/l3fwd/main.c
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
> > #include "l3fwd.h"
> > #include "l3fwd_event.h"
> >
> > -#define MAX_TX_QUEUE_PER_PORT RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS
> > +#define MAX_TX_QUEUE_PER_PORT RTE_MAX_LCORE
> > #define MAX_RX_QUEUE_PER_PORT 128
> >
> > #define MAX_LCORE_PARAMS 1024
>
> Later in the code, the associated check on nb_lcores > RTE_MAX_LCORE
> does not make much sense.
> But keeping this MAX_TX_QUEUE_PER_PORT macro is a way to document how
> the txq are allocated.
> So this change lgtm.
>
> Reviewed-by: David Marchand <david.march...@redhat.com>
>
>
> --
> David Marchand
>
