On 1/8/21 6:02 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/17/2020 10:06 AM, Joyce Kong wrote:
>> + /**
>> + * Update data length and packet length for descriptor.
>> + * structure of pkt_mb:
>> + *
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> + * |32 bits pkt_type|32 bits pkt_len|16 bits data_len|16 bits
>> vlan_tci|
>> + *
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> + */
>> + pkt_mb[0] = vreinterpretq_u64_u8(vqtbl1q_u8(
>> + vreinterpretq_u8_u64(desc[0]), shuf_msk1));
>> + pkt_mb[1] = vreinterpretq_u64_u8(vqtbl1q_u8(
>> + vreinterpretq_u8_u64(desc[0]), shuf_msk2));
>> + pkt_mb[2] = vreinterpretq_u64_u8(vqtbl1q_u8(
>> + vreinterpretq_u8_u64(desc[1]), shuf_msk1))'
>
> s\'\;
>
> I will fix in next-net but my concern is why this has been not caught by
> any of our automated builds?
>
> In patchwork only test report seems from the 'checkpatch':
> https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/84260/
>
Thanks Ferruh for spotting and fixing it.
I think the CI was broken at the time it was submitted, it would be
great to have a way to manually trigger the CI again!
That plus me changing laptop recently and not having a full multi-arch
build system up and running again made this build issue pass through...
Regards,
Maxime
