Hi Jingjing,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wu, Jingjing <jingjing...@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 2:05 PM
> To: Xia, Chenbo <chenbo....@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; tho...@monjalon.net;
> david.march...@redhat.com
> Cc: step...@networkplumber.org; Liang, Cunming <cunming.li...@intel.com>; Lu,
> Xiuchun <xiuchun...@intel.com>; Li, Miao <miao...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 5/8] emu/iavf: add resource management and internal
> logic of iavf
> 
> > +static ssize_t iavf_emu_bar0_rw(struct rte_vfio_user_reg_info *reg, char
> > *buf,
> > +   size_t count, loff_t pos, bool iswrite) {
> > +   struct iavf_emudev *dev = (struct iavf_emudev *)reg->priv;
> > +   char *reg_pos;
> > +
> > +   if (!reg->base) {
> > +           EMU_IAVF_LOG(ERR, "BAR 0 does not exist\n");
> > +           return -EFAULT;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   if (pos + count > reg->info->size) {
> > +           EMU_IAVF_LOG(ERR, "Access exceeds BAR 0 size\n");
> > +           return -EINVAL;
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   reg_pos = (char *)reg->base + pos;
> > +
> > +   if (!iswrite) {
> > +           rte_memcpy(buf, reg_pos, count);
> > +   } else {
> > +           int tmp;
> > +           uint32_t val;
> > +           int idx = -1;
> > +
> > +           if (count != 4)
> > +                   return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +           val = *(uint32_t *)buf;
> > +           /* Only handle interrupt enable/disable for now */
> > +           if (pos == IAVF_VFINT_DYN_CTL01) {
> > +                   tmp = val & IAVF_VFINT_DYN_CTL01_INTENA_MASK;
> > +                   idx = 0;
> > +           } else if ((pos >= IAVF_VFINT_DYN_CTLN1(0)) && pos <=
> > +
> >     IAVF_VFINT_DYN_CTLN1(RTE_IAVF_EMU_MAX_INTR - 1)) {
> > +                   tmp = val & IAVF_VFINT_DYN_CTLN1_INTENA_MASK;
> > +                   idx = pos - IAVF_VFINT_DYN_CTLN1(0);
> > +                   if (idx % 4)
> > +                           return -EINVAL;
> > +                   idx = idx / 4;
> Should be idx = idx / 4 + 1; ?

Yes! Will fix in v3.

> 
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           if (idx != -1 &&
> > +                   tmp != dev->intr->info[idx].enable && dev->ready) {
> > +                   dev->ops->update_status(dev->edev);
> > +                   dev->intr->info[idx].enable = tmp;
> dev->intr->info[idx].enable need to be set before update_status callback is
> called.

Yes. Will fix this too.

Thanks!
Chenbo

> 
> > +           }
> > +
> > +           rte_memcpy(reg_pos, buf, count);
> > +   }
> > +
> > +   return count;
> > +}

Reply via email to