Hi Ouyang,
<snip>
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_ethdev.c
> > @@ -438,6 +438,24 @@ virtio_dev_cq_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev
> > *dev, uint16_t vtpci_queue_idx, }
> >
> > static void
> > +virtio_free_queues(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) {
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> > + virtio_dev_rx_queue_release(dev->data->rx_queues[i]);
> > + dev->data->rx_queues[i] = NULL;
> > + }
> > + dev->data->nb_rx_queues = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> > + virtio_dev_tx_queue_release(dev->data->tx_queues[i]);
> > + dev->data->tx_queues[i] = NULL;
> > + }
> > + dev->data->nb_tx_queues = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > virtio_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev) {
> > struct virtio_hw *hw = dev->data->dev_private; @@ -451,6 +469,7
> @@
> > virtio_dev_close(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> > vtpci_reset(hw);
> > hw->started = 0;
> > virtio_dev_free_mbufs(dev);
> > + virtio_free_queues(dev);
>
> Validate it with vhost sample or not for this change?
I have tested this change with testpmd on a Fedora VM.
Regards,
Bernard.
>
> > }
> >
> > static void
> > --
> > 1.9.1
