Windows build of the current libefx rejects these specifiers.
They're unneeded anyway; the compiler should decide inlining.
Fixes: 34285fd0891d ("common/sfc_efx/base: add match spec validate API")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org
Signed-off-by: Ivan Malov <ivan.ma...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Rybchenko <andrew.rybche...@oktetlabs.ru>
Reviewed-by: Andy Moreton <amore...@xilinx.com>
---
drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
index ee0a3d319..cbc1cb28c 100644
--- a/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
+++ b/drivers/common/sfc_efx/base/efx_mae.c
@@ -760,7 +760,7 @@ efx_mae_match_specs_equal(
((_mask)[(_bit) / (_mask_page_nbits)] & \
(1ULL << ((_bit) & ((_mask_page_nbits) - 1))))
-static inline boolean_t
+static boolean_t
efx_mask_is_prefix(
__in size_t mask_nbytes,
__in_bcount(mask_nbytes) const uint8_t *maskp)
@@ -780,7 +780,7 @@ efx_mask_is_prefix(
return B_TRUE;
}
-static inline boolean_t
+static boolean_t
efx_mask_is_all_ones(
__in size_t mask_nbytes,
__in_bcount(mask_nbytes) const uint8_t *maskp)
@@ -794,7 +794,7 @@ efx_mask_is_all_ones(
return (t == (uint8_t)(~0));
}
-static inline boolean_t
+static boolean_t
efx_mask_is_all_zeros(
__in size_t mask_nbytes,
__in_bcount(mask_nbytes) const uint8_t *maskp)
--
2.20.1
