On 11/24/2020 12:23 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 11/24/2020 10:27 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
Is it OK to keep this regression?

Ferruh, what do you suggest?


I confirm the '--txpkts' parameter is broken now, I suggest submitting a defect for it and continue with the regression.


Hi Slava,

Can you please submit the Bugzilla defect?

Thanks,
ferruh


We have alternative for the parameter, "set txpkts <len0[,len1]*>" command.
The parameter was only working when hardcoded '--txd=N' parameter is provided, the command is more dynamic and works however queue size is configured.

We can fix the '--txpkts' in next release.


23/11/2020 12:50, Slava Ovsiienko:
Hi,  Wei

It was found this patch rejects the --txpkts command line settings.
set_tx_pkt_segments() is called before device started and
we have failure chain:

set_tx_pkt_segments()
   nb_segs_is_invalid()
     get_tx_ring_size ()
      rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get()

It causes --txpkts testpmd command line option is ignored.

With best regards, Slava

-----Original Message-----
From: dev <dev-boun...@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Wei Hu (Xavier)
Sent: Friday, September 25, 2020 15:47
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: xavier.hu...@huawei.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/6] app/testpmd: remove restriction on txpkts
set

From: Chengchang Tang <tangchengch...@huawei.com>

Currently, if nb_txd is not set, the txpkts is not allowed to be set because the
nb_txd is used to avoid the numer of segments exceed the Tx ring size and the
default value of nb_txd is 0. And there is a bug that nb_txd is the global
configuration for Tx ring size and the ring size could be changed by some
command per queue. So these valid check is unreliable and introduced
unnecessary constraints.

This patch adds a valid check function to use the real Tx ring size to check the
validity of txpkts.

Fixes: af75078fece3 ("first public release")
Cc: sta...@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Chengchang Tang <tangchengch...@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Wei Hu (Xavier) <xavier.hu...@huawei.com>
---
v3 -> v4:
     add check 'rte_eth_rx_queue_info_get()' return value and
     if it is '-ENOSTUP' calculate the 'ring_size'.
v3:      initial version.
---
  app/test-pmd/config.c | 64
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 60 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test-pmd/config.c b/app/test-pmd/config.c index
6496d2f..8ebb927 100644
--- a/app/test-pmd/config.c
+++ b/app/test-pmd/config.c
@@ -1893,6 +1893,38 @@ tx_queue_id_is_invalid(queueid_t txq_id)  }

  static int
+get_tx_ring_size(portid_t port_id, queueid_t txq_id, uint16_t
+*ring_size) {
+    struct rte_port *port = &ports[port_id];
+    struct rte_eth_txq_info tx_qinfo;
+    int ret;
+
+    ret = rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get(port_id, txq_id, &tx_qinfo);
+    if (ret == 0) {
+        *ring_size = tx_qinfo.nb_desc;
+        return ret;
+    }
+
+    if (ret != -ENOTSUP)
+        return ret;
+    /*
+     * If the rte_eth_tx_queue_info_get is not support for this PMD,
+     * ring_size stored in testpmd will be used for validity verification.
+     * When configure the txq by rte_eth_tx_queue_setup with
nb_tx_desc
+     * being 0, it will use a default value provided by PMDs to setup this
+     * txq. If the default value is 0, it will use the
+     * RTE_ETH_DEV_FALLBACK_TX_RINGSIZE to setup this txq.
+     */
+    if (port->nb_tx_desc[txq_id])
+        *ring_size = port->nb_tx_desc[txq_id];
+    else if (port->dev_info.default_txportconf.ring_size)
+        *ring_size = port->dev_info.default_txportconf.ring_size;
+    else
+        *ring_size = RTE_ETH_DEV_FALLBACK_TX_RINGSIZE;
+    return 0;
+}
+
+static int
  rx_desc_id_is_invalid(uint16_t rxdesc_id)  {
      if (rxdesc_id < nb_rxd)
@@ -2986,17 +3018,41 @@ show_tx_pkt_segments(void)
      printf("Split packet: %s\n", split);
  }

+static bool
+nb_segs_is_invalid(unsigned int nb_segs) {
+    uint16_t ring_size;
+    uint16_t queue_id;
+    uint16_t port_id;
+    int ret;
+
+    RTE_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(port_id) {
+        for (queue_id = 0; queue_id < nb_txq; queue_id++) {
+            ret = get_tx_ring_size(port_id, queue_id, &ring_size);
+
+            if (ret)
+                return true;
+
+            if (ring_size < nb_segs) {
+                printf("nb segments per TX packets=%u >= "
+                       "TX queue(%u) ring_size=%u - ignored\n",
+                       nb_segs, queue_id, ring_size);
+                return true;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    return false;
+}
+
  void
  set_tx_pkt_segments(unsigned *seg_lengths, unsigned nb_segs)  {
      uint16_t tx_pkt_len;
      unsigned i;

-    if (nb_segs >= (unsigned) nb_txd) {
-        printf("nb segments per TX packets=%u >= nb_txd=%u -
ignored\n",
-               nb_segs, (unsigned int) nb_txd);
+    if (nb_segs_is_invalid(nb_segs))
          return;
-    }

      /*
       * Check that each segment length is greater or equal than
--
2.9.5









Reply via email to