On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:11:54PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 12:29:53AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2015-07-11 01:18, Pablo de Lara: > > > The main change when creating a new table is that the number of entries > > > per bucket is fixed now, so its parameter is ignored now > > > (still there to maintain the same parameters structure). > > > > Why not rename the "bucket_entries" field to "reserved"? > > The API of this field has changed (now ignored) so it should be reflected > > without changing the ABI. > > Since the hash_create function is itself already versionned to take account > of the > new struct parameter, there is no reason to keep the field at all, as far as > I can see. > We can just drop it, and let the ABI versionning handle the change. > > /Bruce
Sorry, my mistake. It's no longer versioned in the patchset that was merged, so the field does need to be kept. :-( /Bruce
