> > Apologies for the delay, I missed your reply Li. > With the data you've provided I think the patch is justified. > I think the rollback requires some explanation in the code as it may not be > immediately clear what is happening. > I suggest a v3 with either a comment above the rollback, or a new function as > described in my previous mail, also with a comment. >
Ok, we will send V3 Thanks -Li > Thanks for the patch. > > Ciara
