> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] windows: minor build fixes > > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > 12/11/2020 22:35, Tal Shnaiderman: > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] windows: minor build fixes > > > > > > Missing / incorrect '--in-reply-to'. Please ignore - still learning the > > > process! > > > > > > On 31/10/2020 06:43, Nick Connolly wrote: > > > > Meson versions >= 0.54.0 include support for handling /implib with > > > > msvc link. Specifying it explicitly causes failures when linking > > > > against the dll. Tested using Link 14.27.29112.0 and Clang 11.0.0. > > > > > > > > How can we verify this behavior change in 0.54 is intentional? > > I cannot find it in the versions' release notes: > > > > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmes > o > > nbuild.com%2FRelease-notes-for-0-54- > 0.html&data=04%7C01%7Ctalshn%4 > > > 0nvidia.com%7C958236d4a61f4a12411808d887dcd2b7%7C43083d15727340c1 > b7db3 > > > 9efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637408729782053998%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs > b3d8eyJWI > > > joiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1 > 000&a > > > mp;sdata=21h2QD1OJQt88icTM0kd%2FbkuFzlBq4J5tMJRsh4x9LY%3D&r > eserved > > =0 > > I've found 2 commits touching implib in meson 0.54: > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > ub.com%2Fmesonbuild%2Fmeson%2Fcommit%2Fcace70c64eab4&data > =04%7C01%7Ctalshn%40nvidia.com%7C958236d4a61f4a12411808d887dcd2b7 > %7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637408729782053998 > %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=w9k3%2FvRIWT8Jb > Bm0HXYGZSqW2i0%2BZfq05jzloobNdyc%3D&reserved=0 > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgith > ub.com%2Fmesonbuild%2Fmeson%2Fcommit%2F06bbf6cf9353f6&data > =04%7C01%7Ctalshn%40nvidia.com%7C958236d4a61f4a12411808d887dcd2b7 > %7C43083d15727340c1b7db39efd9ccc17a%7C0%7C0%7C637408729782063987 > %7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiL > CJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=62PcG42%2FiD3n8s > 5%2BD7H6iYEvxS8hAGZFta1vR8suGSM%3D&reserved=0 >
Thanks Thomas, I assume it's part of their changes in that area. >
