On Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:53:51 +0200 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon at 6wind.com> wrote:
> 2015-07-09 10:43, Stephen Hemminger: > > From: Stephen Hemminger <shemming at brocade.com> > > > > The internal API for some functions used by KNI changes in current > > kernel. KNI really needs to be submitted upstream (by Intel) > > to keep it maintainable. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen at networkplumber.org> > > There was already a similar patchset from Miguel Bernal Marin waiting for > review: > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5862 > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5863 > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/5864 Sure Intel patch is cleaner. But KNI, is heading down an #ifdef rathole.
