05/11/2020 14:36, Olivier Matz:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 03:42:01PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > The mbuf header files had some commenting style errors that affected the
> > API documentation.
> > Also, the RTE_ prefix was missing on a macro and a definition.
> > 
> > Note: This patch does not touch the offload and attachment flags that are
> > also missing the RTE_ prefix.
> > 
> > Changes only affecting documentation:
> > * Removed the MBUF_INVALID_PORT definition from rte_mbuf.h; it is
> >   already defined in rte_mbuf_core.h.
> >   This removal also reestablished the description of the
> >   rte_pktmbuf_reset() function.
> > * Corrected the comment related to RTE_MBUF_MAX_NB_SEGS.
> > * Corrected the comment related to PKT_TX_QINQ_PKT.
> > 
> > Changes regarding missing RTE_ prefix:
> > * Converted the MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK() macro to an
> >   __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() inline function.
> >   Added backwards compatible macro with the original name.
> > * Renamed the MBUF_INVALID_PORT definition to RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID.
> >   Added backwards compatible definition with the original name.
> > 
> > v2:
> > * Use RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID instead of MBUF_INVALID_PORT in rte_mbuf.c.
> > 
> > v3:
> > * The functions/macros used in __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() require
> >   RTE_ENABLE_ASSERT or RTE_LIBRTE_MBUF_DEBUG, or they don't use the mbuf
> >   parameter, which generates a compiler waning. So mark the mbuf parameter
> >   __rte_unused if none of them are defined.
> > 
> > v4:
> > * Removed compile time variants of __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check(); keeping
> >   the one variant where the mbuf parameter is marked __rte_unused.
> > * Reflect in the __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() description headline that
> >   it is for debug mode.
> > * Improved the description of RTE_MBUF_PORT_INVALID.
> > * Updated sfc driver to use __rte_mbuf_raw_sanity_check() instead of
> >   MBUF_RAW_ALLOC_CHECK().
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Morten Brørup <m...@smartsharesystems.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.m...@6wind.com>
> 
> Thanks!
Applied, thanks




Reply via email to