When a RSS rule with symmetric hash function, the RSS type shouldn't
carry with SRC/DST_ONLY. This patch adds invalid RSS type check for
the case.

Fixes: 91f27b2e39ab ("net/iavf: refactor RSS")

Signed-off-by: Simei Su <simei...@intel.com>

v3:
* correct invalid case.

v2:
* move invalid check into "iavf_any_invalid_rss_type".
---
 drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c | 16 ++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c
index be821b6..c7fef5b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c
+++ b/drivers/net/iavf/iavf_hash.c
@@ -834,10 +834,22 @@ static struct rss_attr_type rss_attr_to_valid_type[] = {
 };
 
 static bool
-iavf_any_invalid_rss_type(uint64_t rss_type, uint64_t allow_rss_type)
+iavf_any_invalid_rss_type(enum rte_eth_hash_function func,
+                         uint64_t rss_type, uint64_t allow_rss_type)
 {
        uint32_t i;
 
+       /**
+        * Check if SRC/DST_ONLY is set for SYMMETRIC_TOEPLITZ
+        * hash function.
+        */
+       if (func == RTE_ETH_HASH_FUNCTION_SYMMETRIC_TOEPLITZ) {
+               if (rss_type & (VALID_RSS_ATTR &
+                   ~(RTE_ETH_RSS_L3_PRE64 | ETH_RSS_L2_SRC_ONLY |
+                   ETH_RSS_L2_DST_ONLY)))
+                       return true;
+       }
+
        /* check invalid combination */
        for (i = 0; i < RTE_DIM(invalid_rss_comb); i++) {
                if (__builtin_popcountll(rss_type & invalid_rss_comb[i]) > 1)
@@ -917,7 +929,7 @@ iavf_hash_parse_action(struct iavf_pattern_match_item 
*match_item,
                         */
                        rss_type = rte_eth_rss_hf_refine(rss_type);
 
-                       if (iavf_any_invalid_rss_type(rss_type,
+                       if (iavf_any_invalid_rss_type(rss->func, rss_type,
                                        match_item->input_set_mask))
                                return rte_flow_error_set(error, ENOTSUP,
                                                RTE_FLOW_ERROR_TYPE_ACTION,
-- 
2.9.5

Reply via email to