In two test cases, the op value is set by the return of the
process_crypto_request function, which may be NULL. The op->status
value was checked afterwards, which was causing a dereference issue.

To fix this, a temporary op variable is used to hold the return
from the process_crypto_request function, so the original op->status
can be checked after the possible NULL return value.
The original op value is then set to hold the temporary op value.

Coverity issue: 363465
Coverity issue: 363452
Fixes: 4868f6591c6f ("test/crypto: add cases for raw datapath API")
Cc: roy.fan.zh...@intel.com

Signed-off-by: Ciara Power <ciara.po...@intel.com>
---
 app/test/test_cryptodev.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
index 0fed124d3a..ce8bcd1d4f 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev.c
@@ -6676,6 +6676,7 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher(const struct 
mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
        unsigned int ciphertext_len;
 
        struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info;
+       struct rte_crypto_op *op;
 
        /* Check if device supports particular algorithms separately */
        if (test_mixed_check_if_unsupported(tdata))
@@ -6771,17 +6772,17 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher(const struct 
mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
        if (retval < 0)
                return retval;
 
-       ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params->valid_devs[0],
-                       ut_params->op);
+       op = process_crypto_request(ts_params->valid_devs[0], ut_params->op);
 
        /* Check if the op failed because the device doesn't */
        /* support this particular combination of algorithms */
-       if (ut_params->op == NULL && ut_params->op->status ==
+       if (op == NULL && ut_params->op->status ==
                        RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_INVALID_SESSION) {
                printf("Device doesn't support this mixed combination. "
                                "Test Skipped.\n");
                return -ENOTSUP;
        }
+       ut_params->op = op;
 
        TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed to retrieve obuf");
 
@@ -6872,6 +6873,7 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct 
mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
        uint8_t digest_buffer[10000];
 
        struct rte_cryptodev_info dev_info;
+       struct rte_crypto_op *op;
 
        /* Check if device supports particular algorithms */
        if (test_mixed_check_if_unsupported(tdata))
@@ -6976,17 +6978,17 @@ test_mixed_auth_cipher_sgl(const struct 
mixed_cipher_auth_test_data *tdata,
        if (retval < 0)
                return retval;
 
-       ut_params->op = process_crypto_request(ts_params->valid_devs[0],
-                       ut_params->op);
+       op = process_crypto_request(ts_params->valid_devs[0], ut_params->op);
 
        /* Check if the op failed because the device doesn't */
        /* support this particular combination of algorithms */
-       if (ut_params->op == NULL && ut_params->op->status ==
+       if (op == NULL && ut_params->op->status ==
                        RTE_CRYPTO_OP_STATUS_INVALID_SESSION) {
                printf("Device doesn't support this mixed combination. "
                                "Test Skipped.\n");
                return -ENOTSUP;
        }
+       ut_params->op = op;
 
        TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(ut_params->op, "failed to retrieve obuf");
 
-- 
2.25.1

Reply via email to