> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <tho...@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2020 5:02 AM
> To: McDaniel, Timothy <timothy.mcdan...@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Carrillo, Erik G <erik.g.carri...@intel.com>; Eads, Gage
> <gage.e...@intel.com>; Van Haaren, Harry <harry.van.haa...@intel.com>;
> jer...@marvell.com; david.march...@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/23] Add DLB2 PMD
> 
> 30/10/2020 10:43, Timothy McDaniel:
> > - note that the code still uses its private byte-encoded versions of
> >   umonitor/umwait, rather than the new functions in the power
> >   patch that are built on top of those intrinsics. This is intentional.
> 
> Why? Now these intrinsics are available in the main branch.
> We should avoid duplicating such code.
> 
> 

I had asked that the low level intrinsics (UMWAIT/UMONITOR) be split out so 
that DLB/DLB2 could use them instead of its own private byte-encoded versions, 
but instead we have these wrappers that call the low level intrinsics. Those 
wrappers
introduce additional overhead that is not required for DLB/DLB2. I have a 
meeting with Ma Liang on Monday to discuss.

Reply via email to