Hi Thomas, I think I addressed all of the questions in relation to V9. I don't think I can solve the issue of a generic API on my own. From the Community Call last week Jerin also said that a generic was investigated but that a single solution wasn't feasible. This API is experimental and other vendor support can be added as needed. If there are any other open issue let me know?
Regards Liang On 27 Oct 17:02, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Please be more patient. > I asked some questions on v9 (ethdev API is not generic enough), > and you send a v10 in the same minute you reply, > without making sure I agree with your answers. > > >
